Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001582
Original file (ND1001582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EO3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100609
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USAR 20031201 - 20040524 HON               Active:   20000718 - 20031130 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20040525     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20070607      Highest Rank/Rate: EO3
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 14 D a ys
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 13 D a y ( s )
         Active   Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 13 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 44
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 4.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.5

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      ACM AAM NDSM ASR OSR DMB

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 12, effective 5 August 2005 until 2 April 2009, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-158, SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        Applicant seeks discharge and RE code upgrade s to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.
2.       Applicant contends his discharge was improper as his absence from drill was coordinated with his Leading Petty Officer (LPO) due to financial and emotional dilem m a s .
Decision

Date : 20 1 1 10 05             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one d ecisional issue for the Board ’s consideration . T he Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention warnings, commanding officer nonjudicial punishment (NJP), or trial by courts-martial. The record did reflect that the Applicant was authorized to miss the scheduled drill periods for Jun e 2006 (3-4 Jun e 2006), but made up those drills later the same month between 24-25 June. However, the record indicates he missed 16 additional drill periods ( which were not authorized ) between Jul y 2006 and Jan uary 2007. On 1 Feb ruary 2007, the Applicant’s command sent, via certified mail, notification of pending administrative separation processing for unsatisfactory participation in the R eady R eserve. U.S. Postal Service tracking data revealed the notification package was delivered on 3 Feb ruary 2007 to the Applicant’s address of record. On 9 Mar ch 2007 (more than 30 days after notification and with no response from the Applicant), his command submitted a request for administrative separation from the Navy to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERSCOM). On 18 Apr il 2007, PERSCOM directed the Applicant be separated from the Navy with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve. The discharge was effected on 7 Jun e 2007 .

 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks discharge and RE code upgrade s to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was improper as his absence from drill was coordinated with his LPO due to financial and emotional dilem mas . The Board conducted a detailed review of the Applicant’s service records to determine whether his discharge met the pertinent standards of propriety and equity. The Board found no evidence within the records to support the Applicant’s claim that he had been authorized extended absence from required drill periods. Moreover, between Jul 2006 and Jan 2007, the Applicant’s record indicates he missed 16 drill periods. When the command notified him , via certified mail , of pending administrative separation processing, he failed to respond , thereby waiving his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review. After consideration of all the available evidence, and with no evidence submitted by the Applicant to rebut the presumption of regularity, the NDRB found this issue to be without merit and did not provide a basis for which relief could be granted. Relief denied.




Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the administrative separation p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200549

    Original file (ND1200549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20051219Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20060828Highest Rank/Rate: SNLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 10 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: NFIREvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA: N/AAwards and Decorations:NONEPeriods of UA/CONF: NJP:SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401649

    Original file (ND1401649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change to his RE-code.2. The Applicant contends he was wrongly discharged from a drilling status.The Applicant contends he was either present for the annotated missed drills or they were authorized absences. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100567

    Original file (MD1100567.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201398

    Original file (MD1201398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6419,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001319

    Original file (MD1001319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on the Applicant’s refusal to attend required drills with his Reserve Unit, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100097

    Original file (ND1100097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19980219 - 19980525Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19980526Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20001012Highest Rank/Rate:EO3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)17 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 32/45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(5)Behavior:3.2(5)OTA: 3.24Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101270

    Original file (MD1101270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 June 2008, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service due to Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300501

    Original file (MD1300501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201502

    Original file (MD1201502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the records and the Applicant’s statement and submitted documentation, the NDRB determined his discharge was proper and equitable. Full relief to Honorable was not granted, because the NDRB does not consider PTSD as a reason to completely absolve the Applicant of his responsibility to attend required drills.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100324

    Original file (MD1100324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...