Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400371
Original file (MD1400371.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20131219
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20100503 - 20101212     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20101213     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20130809      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 28 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 81
MOS: 0231
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      Rifle CoA (2) LoA

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:             SCM:             SPCM:            CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20120709 :       For your lack of MOS proficiency. Your overall performance is unsatisfactory for your current grade of Lance Corporal. Your need to be closely supervised on even the simplest tasks and the fact that you cannot be depended on to complete any task given to you without considerable assistance is hindering mission accomplishment.

- 20130506 :       For the following deficiency: Medical Non-compliance.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks to use educational benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends her in-service conduct warrants an upgrade.
3.       The Applicant contends she was discharged for a medical condition and not bad conduct , and her command unfairly gave her the General discharge, because she did not want to stay in the Marine Corps .

Decision

 Date: 20140702           Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings . Based on the Applicant ’s condition not a disability , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant right to consult with a qualified counsel but waived her right to submit a written statement.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks to use educational benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs d etermines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants an upgrade solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not provide a foundation upon which the NDRB can grant relief.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her in-service conduct warrants an upgrade. Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. The record shows the Applicant’s average P roficiency and C onduct marks were 3.6 and 3.9, respectively , which is indicative of below-average proficiency and conduct. Further, the Commanding Officer, Personnel Support Detachment 26 letter dated 26 July 2013 shows the Applicant was not recommended for promotion to corporal for the eight months preceding her separation due to her lack of initiative, judgment, leadership, maturity, MOS proficiency, and lack of responsibility. In addition, the Applicant received a retention warning describing that she required close supervis ion for even the simplest tasks , and she could not be depended on to complete any task without considerable assistance. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of her conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of h er service record, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Issue 3: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she was discharged for a medical condition and not bad conduct, and her command unfairly gave her the General discharge, because she did not want to stay in the Marine Corps. The Applicant also contends that her performance improved once she started to take medication for A ttention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder (A DHD ) . When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the NDRB does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition or diagnosis to be of sufficient nature to excuse the negative aspects of her service . The Applicant is correct in that she was discharged for a medical condition and not bad conduct. There is no evidence, however, that her command recommended a General characterization of service because she did not want to stay in the Marine Corps. Once the decision was made to discharge her for a Condition Not a Disability, the Applicant’s record of service was reviewed and the determination was made that due to her low Pro/Con marks, she should receive a General discharge. The record shows the Applicant’s Pro/Con marks declined as she continued her service, which contradicts her assertion that she was a better Marine after receiving ADHD medication. The NDRB d etermined her discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 and Present, paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000170

    Original file (MD1000170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The criteria used by the VA in determining whether a former service member is eligible for benefits is different than that used by the Department of the Navy when determining a member’s characterization of service at discharge.The Applicant should be aware that submission of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board, on a case-by-case basis, in consideration of the unique factors of each discharge action. The...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801706

    Original file (MD0801706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Course - 20041025:For Personality Disorder Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101697

    Original file (MD1101697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19940329 - 19940613Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19940614Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19980324Highest Rank:Length of Service: Years Months11 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:59MOS: 3381Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901902

    Original file (MD0901902.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000382

    Original file (ND1000382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:REQUESTED, BUT NOT SPECIFIED Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19960130Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040322Highest Rank/Rate:HM3Length of Service: Inactive: Year(s) Month(s) 05 Day(s) Active Year(s) Month(s) 18 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 91EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(2)Behavior:3.0(2)OTA:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300456

    Original file (ND1300456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300497

    Original file (MD1300497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19990313 - 19990321Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19990322Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20000308Highest Rank:Length of Service: Years Months12 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:53MOS: 0121Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201197

    Original file (ND1201197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300073

    Original file (ND1300073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant cited her many achievements and honorable service documented in her academic and service records as evidence to hercharacter and contests that she was victimized while in an incapacitated and vulnerable state. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801614

    Original file (ND0801614.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade founded upon these circumstances would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...