Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101697
Original file (MD1101697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110628
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19940329 - 19940613     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19940614     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19980324      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 11 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 59
MOS: 3381
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle MM NDSM LOA (2) GCM MM

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: NONE                 SCM: NONE                 SPCM: NONE      CC: NONE

Retention Warning Counseling : 1

- 19951222 :       For failure to conform to Marine Corps height and weight standards and failure t o maintain standards on the PFT
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6206, UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 to 31 August 2001.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade in order to qualify for v eterans’ b enefits.
2 .       The Applicant believes her post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.
3.       The Applicant contends she was discharged for being overweight, was not a problem Marine, and received Meritorious Mast.
Decision

 Date: 20 1 2 0822            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one 6105 counseling warning . The Applicant was administratively processed for separation by her command for Unsatisfactory Performance due to weight control failure. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitl ed to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade in order to qualify for v eterans’ b enefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant believes her post-service conduct is worthy of consideration. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge. However, there is no law, or regulation, that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to exist during the period of enlistment in question. Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, s he failed to provide any documentary evidence on h er behalf for post-service consideration. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum with the recognition that completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. Without post-service documentary evidence, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions). Relief denied.

Issue 3: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends she was discharged for being overweight, was not a problem Marine, and received Meritorious Mast. Paragraph 6206 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual states that “ a Marine may be separated if the Marine is unqualified for further service by reason of unsatisfactory performance. Unsatisfactory performance is characterized by: a. Performance of assigned tasks and duties in a manner that is not contributory to unit readiness and/or mission accomplishment as documented in the service record; or b. Failure to maintain required proficiency in grade as demonstrated by below average numerical scores or adverse fitness report markings or comments accumulated in the Enlisted Performance Evaluation System. ” It further states that separation processing may not be initiated until the Marine receives a Paragraph 6105 retention counseling. The Applicant received a 6105 warning on 22 December 1995 for failure to maintain Marine Corps height, weight, and PFT standards. Despite her average Proficiency and Conduct marks, Meritorious Mast, and Good Conduct Medal, her command determined that her service was unsatisfactory and discharged her on 24 March 1998 for Unsatisfactory Performance with a General (Under Honorable Conditions). After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined that the discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000170

    Original file (MD1000170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The criteria used by the VA in determining whether a former service member is eligible for benefits is different than that used by the Department of the Navy when determining a member’s characterization of service at discharge.The Applicant should be aware that submission of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board, on a case-by-case basis, in consideration of the unique factors of each discharge action. The...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700270

    Original file (MD0700270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 19960313 Basis for Discharge:FAILURE TO CONFORM TO THE MARINE CORPS HEIGHT/WEIGHT STANDARDSUNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE DUE TO: UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES WHILE ASSIGNED TO THE WEIGHT CONTROL PROGRAMLeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:199603132Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) (NOT FOUND IN...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102141

    Original file (MD1102141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501157

    Original file (MD1501157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6206,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700232

    Original file (MD0700232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and the evidence of post-service conduct did not mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100989

    Original file (ND1100989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100864

    Original file (ND1100864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900916

    Original file (MD0900916.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Should the Applicant feel his post-service conduct becomes substantial enough to warrant a personal appearance before the NDRB,veterans organizations, such as the American Legion, are willing to provide guidance to assist former service members in obtaining a discharge upgrade.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400643

    Original file (MD1400643.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends he was discharged solely for weight / BCP, and a narrative reason of Unsatisfactory Performance indicates there was disciplinary action.Per paragraph 6206, UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN), a member may be separated if the Marine is unqualified for further service by reason of unsatisfactory performance when performance of assigned tasks and duties in a manner that does not contribute to unit readiness...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400187

    Original file (MD1400187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was separated for unsatisfactory performance due to insufficient effort on the Body Composition Program as documented by five 6105 counseling entries and her recommendation for administrative separation by Commanding Officer, Tenant Activities Company. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...