Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301805
Original file (ND1301805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AC2, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20130913
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      
        
Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020522 - 20020606     Active:   20020607 - 200 61119 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20061120     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20110811      Highest Rank/Rate: AC2
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 23 D ay(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 51
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 4 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 4 )        OTA: 2.68

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2)

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20100909 :       For letters of indebtedness from the following: G & H Sales Associates, I nc . dated 20100811, for the amount of $ X,708.51 ; and Navy Exchange Service Command dated 20100706 for the amount of $137.94 and 20100708 for the amount of $590.00. [Exact amount owed to G & H Sales Associates, I nc. is unreadable in service record]

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends he did n ot have a pattern of misconduct.

Decision

Date : 20140403             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service in his current enlistment included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning for indebtedness . Based on the Applicant ’s pattern of failure to pay just debts , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant elected rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . The administrative board voted 3-0 that the preponderance of the evidence supported a pattern of misconduct to pay just debts and recommended separation with an Honorable characterization of service .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he did not have a pattern of misconduct. The Applicant further contends he never had one nonjudicial punishment, let alone two , or any civil conviction . In accordance with Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT , m embers may be separated for a pattern of misconduct when during the current enlistment they have a set pattern of failure to pay just debts . The service record shows the Applicant received a NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning for his indebtedness on 9 September 2010 . In addition, t he service record shows the Applicant had his security clearance and Air Traffic Control Specialist Certification revoked due to his inability to maintain control of his personal financial responsibilities. Further, the Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station Oceana letter dated 27 September 2011 states , “[the Applicant] repeatedly failed to pay just debts” and “[the Applicant] was fully aware of his financial situation and although he received counseling and budget recommendations , he admitted to not following them.” The record also shows the Applicant was properly notified for separation , a nd he exercised his right to appear before an administrative board. The NDRB did find it highly unusual that the Applicant received an Honorable characterization of service, as misconduct of this nature typically results in an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge or, at the very least, a General discharge. The NDRB, however, is not authorized to change a discharge characterization to a more unfavorable level. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500740

    Original file (ND0500740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “financial hardship.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant requested that the Board change the narrative reason for his separation to "Financial Hardship", stating that he requested separation due to such hardship and was supported in this request by his Master Chief at the time. As of this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801293

    Original file (ND0801293.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600744

    Original file (ND0600744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ]940725: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by the discreditable management of your personal and financial affairs resulting in a set pattern of a failure to pay just...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700527

    Original file (ND0700527.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change: Applicant’s Issues: 1. 134 (failure to pay just debts, 7 specifications) NSF checks and unpaid debts totaling $2227.28 for rent, uniforms and cash at NEX.Awarded - FOP ($630.00 for 2months) conditionally suspended for 6 months based on payments of just debts; RIR (E-4); Restr (30days); Extra duties (30days).NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date): NoneApplicant Testified: Applicant Available for Questions: Witnesses:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700497

    Original file (ND0700497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members may be separated by reason of misconduct – pattern of misconduct when during the current enlistment they have a set pattern of failure to pay just debts. 20060412: COMNAVPERSCOM directed Applicant’s Commanding Officer to determine whether to suspend Applicant’s access to classified material pending resolution of clearance issues. Discharge Process Date Notified: 20060427Reason for Discharge:-Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20060427Rights...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00830

    Original file (ND00-00830.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 820402 - 870706 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 811216 - 820401 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 870707 Date of Discharge: 900323 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 08 17 Inactive: None PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00809

    Original file (ND99-00809.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is why I'm ask the board to review my discharge 960228: Fleet Surveillance Support Command, Chesapeake, VA notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offenses and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by all punishments under the UCMJ in your current enlistment, and a set pattern of failure to pay just debts.960312: Civil Conviction: Norfolk General District...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00064

    Original file (ND03-00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00064 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021007, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.900411: Medical Evaluation: Applicant was evaluated and it was determined there is no evidence of neurotic or psychotic disorder, Applicant is able to determine right from wrong, and there is no evidence of physiologic/psychologic addiction to drugs or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801006

    Original file (ND0801006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the NAVPERS 1070/6l3 warning of5 April 2006, the Applicant was notified that assistance in correcting his performance deficiencies, namely his failure to pay his debts, was available from his chain of command and the Command Financial Specialist. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00687

    Original file (ND99-00687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960426 under Other Than Honorable conditions for misconduct due to a Pattern of Misconduct (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. He remains eligible for a personal...