Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801293
Original file (ND0801293.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AMHAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080530
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630600 (PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT)

 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19880826 - 19890801     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19890802     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19930609      Highest Rank/Rate: AMH3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 08 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 68/81
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.4 (4)     Behavior: 3.4 (4)        OTA: 3.45

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

S CM :

SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19910903 :       For dishonorably fail to pay debt.
- 19930420:      For being unsuitable for overseas assignment due to severe indebte dness and financial instability.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Applicant opines that his Other Than H onorable discharge is too harsh.
2. Applicant seeks p ost-service conduct consideration.

Decision

Date : 20 0 9 0624             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings regarding indebtedness and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on the Applicant’s failure to pay just debts, command administratively processed for separation. When processed for a dministrative s eparation, the Applicant waived rights to consult with qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an a dministrative discharge board.

Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that his Other Than H onorable discharge was too harsh. For the information of the Applicant, a member may be separated for a pattern of misconduct based on a set pattern of failure to pay just debts. Although the Applicant provided documentation that he was paying or had paid his debts, he had a significant number of loans or allotments for his pay grade, was counseled regarding his indebtedness , and had received letters for nonpayment. Based on a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Ap plicant’s service. However, due to the Applicant ’s poor financial management of his affairs , the Board determined only partial relief is warranted.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants consideration. The Applicant’s career progression, charitable contributions, and stro ng references demonstrated he possessed character and drive that was not evident during his tour of active duty. However, the Board found that the Applicant’s post-service conduct does not sufficiently mitigate his misconduct while on active duty to warrant full relief as requested in the form of an H onorable discharge. There fore, partial relief is granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .
Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 5 March 1993 until 21 July 1994),
Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801398

    Original file (ND0801398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the discharge was proper but not equitable. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900443

    Original file (ND0900443.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation to help support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance or completion of higher...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000579

    Original file (ND1000579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authority determined that the preponderance of the evidence supported the basis for discharge and that separation from the Naval Service was warranted; as such, he directed that the basis for separation on the DD Form 214 be Misconduct - Pattern of Misconduct. The Separation Authority further directed that the Applicant be discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of his service and that he receive an RE-4 reenlistment code (not recommended for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801140

    Original file (ND0801140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service record is marred by one retention warning and an award of non-judicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 107 (Making a false official statement). ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000058

    Original file (ND1000058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 2: (Decisional) () The NDRB did review this Issue, but since the NDRB granted full relief based on Issue 1, no further response is required.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN. ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801452

    Original file (ND0801452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory separation regardless of time in service or grade. After a thorough review of the records, to include supporting documents, facts, circumstances unique to this case, the substantial post service accomplishments and good citizenship demonstrated by the Applicant,the Board determined the discharge characterization shall change to “ General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” . ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101368

    Original file (ND1101368.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative separation board.The Applicant was separated from the Navy on 2 December 2009 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Pattern of Misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002356

    Original file (MD1002356.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Between November 1998 and June 2000, the Applicant received three NJPs, one civil arrest, and one 6105 retention warning, which included underage drinking, drunk on duty, driving while intoxicated, failure to obey orders and regulations, wrongful cohabitation with a female not his wife, and failure to pay debts and child support payments on time.Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, an Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900656

    Original file (ND0900656.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviewed the evidence of record and the aforementioned misconduct and determined there is sufficient evidence to support discharge due to a pattern of misconduct and the fact that he had completed 90 percent of his enlistment does not preclude the separation authority from involuntarily separating him. However, the Applicant provides no documented information he informed his chain of command of the deaths of his family members and did not receive the assistance, support or leave...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700527

    Original file (ND0700527.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change: Applicant’s Issues: 1. 134 (failure to pay just debts, 7 specifications) NSF checks and unpaid debts totaling $2227.28 for rent, uniforms and cash at NEX.Awarded - FOP ($630.00 for 2months) conditionally suspended for 6 months based on payments of just debts; RIR (E-4); Restr (30days); Extra duties (30days).NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date): NoneApplicant Testified: Applicant Available for Questions: Witnesses:...