Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301324
Original file (ND1301324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AEAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20130529
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:               

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20010615 - 20010912     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20010913     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20030424      Highest Rank/Rate: AEAN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 12 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 74
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 1.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 1.83

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20030210 :      Article (Absence without leave , 2 specifications )
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20 0 30314 :       For Article 86 ( A bsence without leave), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer) , and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation)

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends he was discharged for being gay , and now gay people are allowed in the military.

Decision

Date : 20140116             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave , 2 specifications ) , Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer) , and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation). Based on the Applicant ’s homosexual admission , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review but elected his right to submit a written statement .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was discharged for being gay , and now gay people are allowed in the military. The Applicant received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of h is service at discharge. In accordance with Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN), (NAVPERS 15560C), (effective 22 August 2002 until 28 April 2005), Article 1910-148, SEPARATION BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT, which was in effect at the time of the Applicant’s discharge, the Applicant’s in-service statements to h is chain-of-command documented that he had the propensity to engage in homosexual acts. The Applicant chose not to challenge or to rebut this presumption. Based on the statement made by the Applicant, h is decision not to rebut any presumptions thereafter, and the commanding officer’s belief that the Applicant’s statements were credible, the Applicant was processed administratively for involuntary separation for Homosexual Admission and Commission of a Serious Offense . At the time of discharge, processing for separation was mandatory in accordance with the MILPERSMAN and Department of Defense Policy under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law. Given the detailed documents of record, the Applicant’s personal statement, and the commanding officer’s statement in the separation endorsement, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s separation for Homosexual Admission , in accordance with MILPERSMAN Article 1910-148 , was proper and equitable when it was issued.

Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. An Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service generally meets the standard of acceptable conduct and performance for Naval personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization of service would be clearly inappropriate. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is warranted when the quality of the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. The Applicant’s service record reflected one NJP for violating U CMJ Article 86 (Absence without leave, 2 specifications), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer), and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) and a retention warning . Given the comments of the commanding officer that the Applicant “has refused to do certain taskings and has been disrespectful to his chain of command , because he feels the jobs are menial and degrading,” the NDRB determined that the misconduct was reflective of the Applicant’s overall performance of duties and conduct. Based on the evidence of record, and in consideration of the statements from the chain of command and counseling records regarding the Applicant’s performance and conduct, the N DRB determined the quality of the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful. However, significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. As such, it is appropriate to characterize the service as General (Under Honorable Conditions). Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-148, SEPARATION BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00221

    Original file (ND04-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (2) I recommend that upon member’s discharge his naval service be characterized as “honorable”. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20010119 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality - homosexual admission (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401070

    Original file (ND1401070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends his DD214 should be changed based on new DoD policy.In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. Accordingly, the NDRB determined the Narrative Reason for Separation will change to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001218

    Original file (ND1001218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900417

    Original file (ND0900417.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301187

    Original file (MD1301187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800193

    Original file (ND0800193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201536

    Original file (ND1201536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. Since he was not notified of these bases for separation, the NDRB is not authorized to change his narrative reason to Misconduct....

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100618

    Original file (ND1100618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 Jun 2006, the Applicant’s Commanding Officer submitted a request for administrative separation of the Applicant from the Navy with the recommendation for an Honorable discharge. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100800

    Original file (ND1100800.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries,and the administrative separation process, the Board found Accordingly, and pursuant to the guidance set forth in the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) Memorandum (Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code), dated 20 Sep 2011, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200108

    Original file (ND1200108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE-4.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Narrative Reason for...