Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300011
Original file (ND1300011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-YN3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20121002
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19961008 - 19970908     Active:            19970909 - 20040129
                                    USN      20040130 - 20070909

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070910     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20100820      Highest Rank/Rate: YN2
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 11 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.8 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.8 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.72

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol (3) (3) (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20100609 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 8 specifications )
         Specification 1: Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a withdrawal of $102.00 with a cash advance fee of $2.04
         Specification 2: Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $38.00
         Specification 3 : Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a withdrawal of $42.00 with a cash advance fee of $.84
         Specification 4 : Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $25.01
         Specification 5 : Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $48.00
         Specification 6 : Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a withdrawal of $203.00 with a cash advance of $4.06
         Specification 7 : Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $42.50
         Specification 8 : Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $30.01
         Article (False official statements)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :



Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until 17 August 2011, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 107 .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitabl e , because he served h onorably for 10 years with an impeccable record with numerous awards.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0613             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and proprie ty. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 8 specifications: [1] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a withdrawal of $102.00 with a cash advance fee of $2.04; [2] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $38.00; [3] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a withdrawal of $42.00 with a cash advance fee of $.84; [4] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $25.01; [5] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $48.00; [6] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a withdrawal of $203.00 with a cash advance of $4.06; [7] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $42.50; [8] Derelict in performance of duties in that he willfully used his Government Travel Card to make a purchase of $30.01) and Article (False official statements). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant elected rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board , however, t he NDRB found no evidence in the record to show the Applicant appeared before an administrative separation board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because he served honorably for 10 years with an impeccable record with numerous awards. The Applicant received an Honorable discharge for two previous enlistments from September 1997 to September 2007. Each period of enlistment is an independent obligation and characterization is determined for that specific period of time. In his third enlistment, the Applicant was found guilty at NJP for violati ng UCMJ Articles 92 and 107. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article s 92 and 107 are such offense s that warrant processing for administrative separation regardless of grade, performance, awards, previous enlistments, or time in service and qualify as meeting the requirements for separation due to Misconduct (Serious Offense) since violation of Articles 92 and 107 both could have resulted in a punitive discharge as the result of a Special or General Court-Martial. His command, however, chose the more lenient administrative discharge process. A pattern of misconduct is not necessary to warrant an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge . An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when a member engages in conduct involving one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. In the Applicant’s third enlistment, the NDRB determined , even after reviewing the 13 character references, that he warranted a discharge Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for his violations of UCMJ Articles 92 and 107. Relief denied.



Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0432

    Original file (FD2002-0432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0432 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. b. Grade Status: AlC - 26 Jun 01 (Art 15, Vacation, 28 Sep 01) SrA - 19 May 01 AlC - (EPR Indicates): 2 Jun 99 - 16 Oct 00 c. Time Lost: None. You have been scheduled for an appointment with the 96th Mission Support Squadron, separations section, on 10 Oct 01, at 1400 hours.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500547

    Original file (MD0500547.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Seventy-seven pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR(J) 910530 - 910922 COG Active: USMC 910923 -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00019

    Original file (FD2006-00019.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    JRD FLOOR 4\DRL\\S AFB, 4411 211lfo2.7M2 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSIONAL RATIONALE CASE NlJMBER FD-20(,6-00019 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SrA) 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 6...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00229

    Original file (FD2005-00229.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SSgt) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. BOAR0 ACTION REQUESTED lX onel % CHANGE TO HONORABLE CHANGE TO GENERAUUNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS CHANGE TO UNCHARACTERIZED (Nor applicable for Air Force) CHANGE NARRATIVE REASON FOR SEPARATION TO: (VYWMMDDI (ff date is mare than 15 years ago, submit a DO Form 149) 2002 1223 % 3.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001215

    Original file (ND1001215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s discharge under the pertinent standards of equity and propriety to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency.The Applicant’s violation of Articles 92, 107, and 134 of the UCMJ each warrant punitive discharge and confinement for up to five years, if adjudged at trial by special or general court martial. In this specific case, when recommending administrative separation under other than honorable conditions for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00386

    Original file (FD2005-00386.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I " ' - - SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COLNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00386 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general. The records indicated the applicant was financially irresponsible...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00001

    Original file (FD2006-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7 ~ 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00001 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. Between on or about 21 Aug 96 to on or about 27 Aug 96, you wrongfully made Automatic Teller Machine cash withdrawals and unauthori~d purchases...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401221

    Original file (ND1401221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the document review and the Personal Hearing, the Applicant’s record of service, documentation sent in by the Applicant for in-service and post-service conduct, as well as any statements made written or verbal are examined to see if relief is in order. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00471

    Original file (FD2006-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Sleeping on Post During the time I was under investigation for the fire alarm incident, I was pulling guard duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00271

    Original file (FD2003-00271.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unfortunately neither member’s medical records or the discharge processing files were available to the Board for review due to being missing from the record. Because member’s discharge file was unavailable to the Board for review, the Board was unable to ascertain if there was other misconduct on member’s part, or additional bases for the discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: The discharge is improper because of an unknown medical condition that affected my performance and...