Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301278

Original file (MD1301278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130523

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20010228 - 2001 10 2 8     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 2001 1 029     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20050317      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 18 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 34
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions):     Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Period of UA : 20030105-20030327, 83 days

Period of CONF : 20030606-20030629, 24 days

NJP:

- 20020710 :       Article (Absence without leave , 20020707-20020709, 3 days )
         Article (Failur e to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended: (Vacated 20021004)

- 20021001 :      Article (Absence without leave , 20020923-20020924, 2 days )
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20021114 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (General A rticle)
         Awarded: Suspended: (Vacated 20021212)

- 20030818 :       Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20031117 :      Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

- 20030606 :       Details N ot Found in Record [ Extracted from 14 April 2004 2d Marine Division Staff Judge Advocate Recommendation in the Special Court Martial of Private S. D. Sims letter via 3270 entry]

SPCM:

- 20040129 :       Art icle (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: On or about 03 December 2003 wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana
         Specification 2: Between on or about 18 November 2003 and on or about 03 December 2003 wrongfully use marijuana
         Art icle (General A rticle , restriction breaking )
         Sentence : (20031202-20040202, 62 days)

CIVIL ARREST:

- 20031203 :       Jacksonville Police Department vicinity of Sandy Run Apartments for possession of marijuana [Extracted from Record of Trial]

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20021104 :       For the following deficiencies: SNM has had two NJP s for previous charges of UA, t his is SNM third offense .

- 20021114 :       For the following deficiencies: SNM has 2 prior NJPs f or b eing UA. SNM was UA from formation on 021101 at 0700, SNM returned at 021101 0830 .

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends he warrants clemency for medical reasons .
2.       The Applicant contends he was not offered or afforded the opportunity to receive drug rehabilitation assistance.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 1219          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant ’ s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant ’ s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant ’ s record of service included two 6105 counseling warning s , five non-judicial punishment s for violations of the Uniform Co de of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Unauthorized a bsence , 3 specifications ), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation , 1 specification ), Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances , 2 specifications ), and Article 134 ( General A rticle , 1 specification ) , one S ummary C ourt -M artial (details not found in record) , and one S pecial C ourt- M artial for violations of the UCMJ: Article 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances , 2 specifications ) and Article 134 ( General A rticle , 1 specification ). On 26 January 2004 , the Applicant signed a pretrial agreement stipulating he would willingly accept a Bad Conduct Discharge in exchange for his guilty plea at a S pecial Court-Martial. Based on the Applicant ’ s conviction and sentence at a S pecial C ourt- M artial, he was confined and separated with a Bad Conduct Discharge in accordance with the conditions agreed upon in his pretrial agreement. On 04 February 2005 , the Applicant withdrew his case from the appellate review process.

: ( Nond ecisional) The Applicant contends he warrants clemency for medical reasons. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was not offered or afforded the opportunity to receive drug rehabilitation assistance . All servicemembers separated for drug abuse are screened for drug dependency and provided the option of treatment prior to separation. The Applicant’s record of service includes documentation showing he was screened by his unit substance abuse contro l officer on 21 October 2003, was offered assistance, and was advised of administrative separation proceedings for violation of the Marine Corps policy for drug abuse . Drug use is never a rationale or an acceptable excuse for inappropriate conduct, misconduct, or poor judgment . The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the Applicant was not provided the opportunity to receive drug rehabilitation assistance. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Clemency denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201808

Original file (MD1201808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Over the next 14 months, he received another retention warning and was found guilty of additional charges at a second Summary Court-Martial before being found guilty at a Special Court-Martial for violating UCMJ Article 112a for using marijuana. After a review of the records, the NDRB found no basis for clemency. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101407

Original file (MD1101407.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the facts known at the time of the misconduct, the NDRB determined that the deliberate and repetitive violations of the UCMJ warranted punitive action vice administrative processing; as such, the court-martial and resultant Bad Conduct Discharge was appropriate and warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record entries, Medical Record documentation, post service veterans treatment records, and the...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001959

Original file (MD1001959.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A.Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200370

Original file (ND1200370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19980213 - 19980614Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19980615Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20050406Highest Rank/Rate:RMSALength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 11 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 61EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Period of UA:...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002044

Original file (MD1002044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service record documents that he completed the adjudicated period of confinement as awarded by the Special Court-Martial sentence. On 14 May 1996, the Applicant submitted a request for clemency to the Convening Authority; on 19 August, the Convening Authority acted on the request for clemency and reduced the sentence of confinement for six years to a period of four years. Having conducted a detailed review of both the records of trial by Special and by General Court-Martial...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101592

Original file (MD1101592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101513

Original file (MD1101513.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Clemency based on this issue alone is not warranted. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101042

Original file (MD1101042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301218

Original file (MD1301218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s Bad Conduct Discharge was ordered executed by Special Court-Martial Supplemental Order Number 09-0053 on 11 February 2009.: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks clemency to reenlist into the Armed Forces.Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Clemency denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence,...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100629

Original file (MD1100629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301278

Similar Decisions