Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101042
Original file (MD1101042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110316
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19960329 - 19960409     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960410     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19981120      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 11 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 59
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle SS Pistol SS SSDR

Periods of CONF :

NJP: 4

- 19970312 :       Article 112 (Drunk on duty, on 19970211)
         Awarded: FOP RESTR EPD Suspended:

- 19970401 :      Article 112 (Drunk on duty, on 19970302)
         Article 134 ( General A rticle - b reaking restriction)
          Awarded : RIR FOP RESTR EPD Susp ended: RESTR EPD

- 19970529:      Article 130 (Housebreaking - unlawfully entered the 2/3 BAS to commit larceny)
         Awarded: FOP RESTR EPD Suspended: NONE

- 19971229:      Article 86 (Absence without leave, UA, 1130-1930 on 19971220)
         Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward noncommissioned officer - refused to give blood following an order from a sergeant to get a fit for duty physical for suspicion of consuming alcohol after being to Level III treatment)
         Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation - failed to report to the battalion first S ergeant after being ordered to do so by a S ergeant)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR Suspended: NONE

SCM: 1

- 19980727 :       Art icle 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances - marijuana)
         Sentence : FOP CONF 30 days



SPCM: 1

- 19981023 :       Article 86 (Absence without leave)
         Art icle 107 (False official statements)
         Sentence : FOP CONF 75 days

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling : 4

- 19970312 :       For being drunk on duty (SNM refused to sign)

- 19970401 :       For being drunk on duty (SNM refused to sign)

- 19970529:      For housebreaking (SNM refused to sign)

- 19971229:      For absence without leave, insubordinate conduct toward non-commissioned officer, and failure to obey order or regulation (SNM refused to sign)

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB note d an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

          “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 January 1997 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends he was facing a medical board at the time of his administrative separation and therefore is deserving of a medical discharge.
2.       The Applicant claims his command rushed his administrative separation.

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0306            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included four 6105 counseling warnings , four nonjudicial punishments (NJPs) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, UA, 1130-1930 on 19971220), Article 91 ( Insubordinate conduct toward noncommissioned officer - refused to give blood following an order from a sergeant to get a fit for duty physical for suspicion of consuming alcohol after being to Level III treatment ), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation - failed to report to the battalion first sergeant after being ordered to do so by a s ergeant ), Article 112 (Drunk on duty, two specifications), Article 130 ( Housebreaking - unlawfully entered the 2/3 BAS to commit larceny ), and Article 134 ( General A rticle - breaking restriction ) , one S ummary C ourt- M artial for violation of the UCMJ: Article 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances - marijuana ) , and one S pecial C ourt- M artial for Article 86 (Absence without leave) and Article 107 (False official statements). The Applicant had a pre-service waiver for two driving while intoxicated (DWI) convictions, but did not have a pre-service waiver for illicit drug use prior to entering the Marine Corps . He acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 19 March 1996 . Based on the Article 112a violation alone , processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised right to consult with a qualified counsel but waived rights to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority and to r equest an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was facing a medical board at the time of his administrative separation and therefore is deserving of a medical discharge. D epartment of Defense disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation and stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The PEB case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. The Applicant had four NJPs, a Summary Court-Martial, and a Special Court-Martial , all of which took precedence for an administrative separation over separation for medical reasons. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant claims his command rushed his administrative separation. The Applicant’s issue is without merit. The a dministrative discharge processing has no specific time requirement s for completion . In t he Applicant’s case, the records show that the Applicant was discharged a month after his Special Court-Martial conviction, which is more than ample time for the Marine Corps to complete a proper administrative discharge of the Applicant. A minor error on a piece of paperwork submitted by the Applicant does not prove the discharge was rushed, nor does it make the discharge improper or inequitable. Relief denied.


Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300958

    Original file (MD1300958.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD13-00958 a ~ ' ,ex-PFC, USMC CURRENT DISCHARGE AND APPLICANT *§ REQUEST Application Received: 20130314 Characterization of Service Received: (corrected) UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) MISCONDUCT Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5 [DRUGS] Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTED SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500571

    Original file (ND1500571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends that he was not given the option to go through a discharge board while being processed out of the Navy. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800085

    Original file (MD0800085.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301650

    Original file (ND1301650.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY = NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT =a APPLICANTS IssuES 1. Additional Reviews: After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant's date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101571

    Original file (ND1101571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20000621 - 20000625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20000626Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20031103Highest Rank/Rate:ET3Length of Service:Years Months08 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: NFIREvaluationMarks:Performance:3.3(4)Behavior:2.8(4)OTA: 3.29Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle EX Pistol...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100869

    Original file (ND1100869.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall PATTERN OF...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501251

    Original file (MD1501251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001589

    Original file (MD1001589.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500755

    Original file (MD1500755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant completed his first enlistment period with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service for that period of service. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500131

    Original file (MD1500131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s service and medical record document that the epilepsy existed prior to service, and the Applicant’s failure to disclose it could have resulted in charges for Article 83 (Fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...