Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300417

Original file (MD1300417.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20121218

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19971205 - 19980907     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19980908     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20031021      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 14 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 43
MOS: 0811
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): / ( )       Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle LoA

NJP:

- 20000620 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 3 specifications )
         Specification 1: Willfully disobeyed a lawful written order by consuming alcohol while under the legal drinking age
         Specification 2: Willfully disobeyed a lawful written order by leaving his “liberty buddy” while on liberty on two separate occasions
         Specif ication 3 : Willfully disobeyed a lawful written order by operating a Japanese Foreign National’s vehicle without a valid driver’s license or without authority to do so
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20010601 :       Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , on or about 0240, 010517, violate a lawful general order, to wit: MCO 1700.22D, dated 29 Aug 97, by underage drinking )
         Article (General A rticle, on or about 0240, 010517, wrongfully and falsely alter a military identification card by changing the birth date so that the SNM could purchase alcohol )
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20010907 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, on or about, 0630, 010713, violate a military protective order issued by LtCol T _ )
         Awarded: Suspended: (1 month) (suspended during weekends when member was supposed to be incarcerated at the Glenhelen Detention Center for a spousal abuse conviction)

SCM:

SPCM:

- 20011128 :       Art icle (Absence without leave , 7 specifications )
         Specification 1: UA from duty place 20010907-20010908
         Specification 2: UA from duty place 20010914-20010916
         Specification 3 : UA from duty place 20010921-20010923
         Specif ication 4 : UA from duty place 20010928-20010930
         Specification 5 : UA from duty place 20011006-20011008
         Specif ication 6 : UA from duty place 20011012-20011013
         Specification 7 : UA from duty place 20011017
         Art icle (Failure to obey order or regulation , consuming alcohol while on restriction )
         Sentence : CONF 6 months (suspended all in excess of 43 days , 20011016-20011127 )

CC:

- 20010724 :       Offense: S pousal abuse
         Sentence : 90 days confinement at the Glenhelen Detention Center (on weekends)

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20010509 :       For underage drinking

- 20010725 :       For being convicted of the serious offense of spousal abuse in San Berna r dino Superior C ourt on 20010724

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant seeks to enhance employment and educational opportunities and to receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits .
2.       The Applicant seeks clemency.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 10 16          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning s , for o f the Uniform Co de of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 5 specifications) and Article 134 (General A rticle, 1 specification ) , Special Court-Martial for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Absence without leave , 7 specifications ) and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 1 specification) , and a civil conviction for spousal abuse. The service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 2 8 November 2001 . A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant throughout the trial by Special Court-Martial process. Given the facts of the case, the Special Court-Martial awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge, forfeiture of $6 95 pay per month for six months, reduction to pay grade E-1, and confinement for a period of six months . The C onvening A uthority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended all confinement in excess of time served ( 43 days) in accordance with the terms of a pretrial agreement. The case was submitted for review to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps C ourt of Criminal Appeals with one assignment of error; it was reviewed , and the findings were affirmed on 20 J une 2003 .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks to enhance employment and educational opportunities and to receive VA benefits . The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Issue 2: (Decisional) (Clemency) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant seeks clemency. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. After a complete review of the Applicant’s service record and his statement to the NDRB, the NDRB found no basis to grant clemency. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . T he Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801866

Original file (ND0801866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Record of service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000521

Original file (ND1000521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The NDRB determined the...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100249

Original file (MD1100249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500227

Original file (MD1500227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000904

Original file (ND1000904.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

It also included summary courts-martial for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Unauthorized absence, 12 specifications) and Article 134 (Breaking restriction, 2 specifications).Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation.When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board. Relief denied.Summary:...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801685

Original file (MD0801685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant provided no documentation or evidence in support of his request for an upgrade and the Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate; clemency is not warranted.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801067

Original file (MD0801067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the characterization of service received was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided, clemency would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801297

Original file (MD0801297.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. The Applicant did not provide any documentation for the Board to consider. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001661

Original file (ND1001661.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant desires to become eligible for the GI Bill.2. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001472

Original file (ND1001472.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing a former service member’s eligibility to receive educational benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300417

Similar Decisions