Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300045
Original file (MD1300045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20121004
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19960723 - 19960917     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 19960918     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19980410      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 23 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 34
MOS:      
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle


NJP:

- 19970519 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, on or about 2250, 19970510, while aboard Okinawa, Japan, did violat e USMARFORJAPANO 1700.1A (under age drinking) by consuming alcohol under the age of 20 years old)
         Article (Assault, on or about 2250, 19970510, while aboard Okinawa, Japan, did assault PFC ______ (Military Police) by attempting to strike him with a closed fist, which escalated into an altercation )
         Article (General article – Disorderly conduct, drunkenness, on or about 2250, 19970510, while aboard Okinawa, Japan, you were intoxicated and combative towards Military Police, which was conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces )
          Awarded: Suspended: Vacated on 19970528

- 19970530 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation) 2 specifications
         Specification 1: On or about 0225, 19970525, while you were adjacent to MCAS Futenma’s front gate, you willfully and unlawfully violated the Commanding Officer’s restriction order by leaving MCAS Futenma, at which time you knew was a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice
         Specification 2: On or about 0225, 19970525, while entering the front gate of MCAS Futenma, Okinawa, Japan, you were cited by military police for under age drinking, which is in violation of USMARFORJAPANO 1700.1A (Under Age Drinking) by consuming alcohol while you were under the age of 20 years old.
         Awarded: Suspended:







SCM:

- 19980224 :      Article (Absence without leave, on or about 0800, 19971213, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty)
         Article (General article) 2 specifications
         Specification 1: In that SNM, U.S. Marine Corps, on or about 19971229, disorderly which conduct was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces
         Specification 2: In that SNM, U.S. Marine Corps, having been restricted to the limits of work place, place of worship, mess hall, and MWR facilities, by a person authorized to do so, did, at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, on or about 19980104, break said restriction
         Sentence: (NFIR)

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19970530 :      For continuous non-compliance with rules and regulations and lack of self-discipline. Your frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military authority is inconsistent with the standards of our Corps. You are hereby counseled that such conduct is unacceptable, reflects poorly on your reliability and character as a Marine and further incidents or occurrences will not be tolerated.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ ”
          “ MISCONDUCT ”

 The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 T he applicant did not state any issues.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0719            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, 3 specifications) , Article 128 ( Assault, 1 specification), and Article 134 ( General article, 1 specification) ; and for of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 1 specification) and Article 134 (General article, 2 specifications) . Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501037

    Original file (MD0501037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. 950324: GCMCA, Commanding General, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, informed the Commandant of the Marine Corps (MMRB), that the Applicant was directed discharged with a under other than honorable conditions by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501530

    Original file (MD0501530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article91, insubordinate conduct, Article 107, false official statement, Article 108,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001819

    Original file (MD1001819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The command opted to prefer the new charges of misconduct to trial by special court-martial.The stated misconduct resulted in the special court-martial awarding a punitive Bad Conduct Dischargeand confinement for 6 months.The NDRB recognizes that many of our service members are young at the time they enlist for service, however, most manage to serve their enlistment honorably. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501570

    Original file (MD0501570.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (“I [Applicant] further understand that I have been recommended for Administrative discharge due to failing the Marine Corps weight control program two times and being assigned for the third time.”) Applicant chooses not to make a statement.970312: Commanding Officer, Marine Air Control Squadron 2, notifies Applicant that he is assigned to the squadron Physical Training Platoon as a result of not being within Marine Corps height and weight standards. Weight: 237. Not due to pathological...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00690

    Original file (MD01-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00690 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010420, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to secretarial authority. st Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The applicant’s discharge was processed in accordance with Marine Corps regulations...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601024

    Original file (MD0601024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-PFC, USMCMD06-01024Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060728Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCT Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: HEADQUARTERS AND HEADQUARTERS SQUADRON, MCAS CHERRY POINTApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070628 Location of Board: Washington...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500604

    Original file (MD0500604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The record shows that the Applicant: o was convicted at nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceedings on 19991029, 19991209, and 20000913 for violations of Articles 91 (Insubordination) and 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) (3 total specifications) of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600248

    Original file (MD0600248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If I am successful I getting my discharge upgraded to honorable and my reinlistment code upgraded I would really consider going back into active duty.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Disabled American Veterans): “Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01040

    Original file (MD01-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01040 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010807, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Necessary corrective actions explained and sources of assistance provided.000622: Summary Court Martial Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a. This was only the second time in his life he has ever smoked marijuana.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600030

    Original file (MD0600030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The order was to stay away from an officer of the Navy. 030929: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, forwards Applicant’s administrative Separation package to Commander Marine Corps Bases Japan concurring with the recommendation of Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Headquarters Squadron.031114: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a...