Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201787
Original file (ND1201787.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EM2, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120821
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:       MEDICAL
        
Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20071221 - 20080707     Active:   20080708 - 20100724 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20100725     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : 6 Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20111215      Highest Rank/Rate: EM2
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 21 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 88
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.2 ( 5 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 5 )        OTA: 3.1

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      PISTOL MM

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), change 35 effective 25 April 2011 until Present, Article 1910-120, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CONDITIONS.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant wants her narrative reason for separation and s eparation code changed to a medical disability.
2.       The Applicant contends she was improperly discharged and should have been evaluated by the Physical Evaluation Board for her Bipolar II Disorder.

Decision

Date : 20 1 3 0530             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning s and no or courts-martial. The Applicant received an enlistment waiver for a pre-existing medical condition of Dorsal Scoliosis that was aggravated by active military service. Based on her continuing back pain and upon the recommendation of Navy medical authorities, command administratively processed for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel or submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitl ed to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants her narrative reason for separation and separation code changed to a medical disability. Under authority of SECNAVINST 5420.174D, the NDRB does not have the ability to change the reason for discharge from or to a physical disability. The NDRB is only authorized to review the propriety and equity of a discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she was improperly discharged and should have been evaluated by the Physical Evaluation Board for her Bipolar II Disorder. The Applicant was diagnosed with chronic back pain caused by scoliosis. Because of her treatment prescribed medications, she lost her nuclear rate qualifications and was denied a rate transfer due to needs of the Navy/total force manning levels. She was then ordered to be administratively separated for Condition Not a Disability due to her chronic back pain . During her treatment for back pain, the Applicant was also diagnosed with B ipolar II D isorder by a Navy psychologist , who attempted to submit the Applicant for processing by the Physical Evaluation Board. Per regulations, the initiation and submission of medical boards are at the discretion of the individual physician. However, this request was subsequently denied by the medical board office. T he evidence of record does not indicate that proper authority erred by not approving a medical board for the Applicant. The Applicant was in a limited duty status and not pending medical board action , therefore, her medical condition was not a bar to separation and did not provide the Applicant the right to suspend separation actions. After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined her discharge proceedings were proper, and she warranted separation with an Honorable characterization of service for Condition Not a Disability due to chronic back pain. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1401777

    Original file (MD1401777.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902639

    Original file (MD0902639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant seeks an upgrade in his characterization of service to Honorable and a change in narrative reason for separation and corresponding separation code from Fraudulent Entry into Military Service to either physical disability by medical board or any other medical discharge separation code. Having reviewed the facts of the discharge, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s characterization of service upon separation as Uncharacterized was appropriate and equitable; a change would be...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101173

    Original file (MD1101173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20040520 - 20050221Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050222Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20050307Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)16 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:31MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):/Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00998

    Original file (PD 2014 00998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20090626 The back condition, characterized as “low back pain for greater than a year” by the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “intervertebral disc syndrome”as unfitting and rated it at 10% citing criteria of Department of Defense Instructions and the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00427

    Original file (PD2011-00427.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic back pain and scoliosis were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as separate medically unacceptable conditions IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated chronic back pain as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria from the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board readily agreed that the 5293 code (intervertebral disc syndrome) was not applicable in this case since no data in evidence suggested that the CI suffered incapacitating episodes per...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020001

    Original file (20140020001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She stated that "she had come into the service with the condition." Thus, if evidence establishes that the Soldier adequately performed the normal duties of his or her office, grade, rank or rating until the time of referral for physical evaluation, the Soldier might be considered fit for duty, even though medical evidence indicates the Soldier's physical ability to perform such duties may be questionable. In regards to her knee pain, the evidence of record shows that the applicant...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01687

    Original file (PD2012 01687.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated the chronic pain of right shoulder status-post arthroscopic surgery condition as unfitting, rated 0% (referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency pain policy), and adjudicated the chronic back pain due to scoliosis condition as existed prior to service (EPTS). At the C&P exam of 9 December 2004, 2 months after separation, the history indicated the CI “had referred low back pain and scoliosis since she was in high...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501165

    Original file (ND0501165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01165 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050706. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). On DD Form 2807, Question 12c, the Applicant denied having “Recurrent back pain or any back problem.” While on active duty, the Applicant encountered significant back pain that was ultimately diagnosed by Navy medical professionals as Spina Bifida Occulta.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005832

    Original file (20130005832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. correction of her DA Form 199 Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show she was being treated for chronic back pain without muscle spasms. The SPD code "JFM" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b (physical disability existing prior to entry on active duty established by PEB proceedings; not entitled to severance pay). There is no evidence to show she was ever given a permanent profile for her knee.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013365

    Original file (20090013365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her physical evaluation board (PEB) findings be corrected to show she was found unfit under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 5289 and 5288, that her disability rating be corrected to show 50 percent, and that she be medically retired due to her increased disability rating. She was rated under the VASRD and given a 10-percent disability rating for codes 5299-5295. Records provided by the VA indicate the applicant...