Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200832

Original file (ND1200832.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120227

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20010327 - 20010329     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20010330     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20030827      Highest Rank/Rate: FN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 28 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 1.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 2.17

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) (2) (2)

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 2002041 6 :      Article ( Absence without leave )
         Article 108 ( Military property of the United States - Loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition )
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20030423 :      Article ( Absence without leave )
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20030 7 2 2 :      Article ( Failure to obey order or regulation , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: NFIR
         Specification 2: NFIR
         Article ( General A rticle , 3 specifications )
         Specification 1: Indecent assault, NFIR
         Specification 2: Indecent assault, NFIR
         Specification 3 : Indecent language, NFIR
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20021107 :       For violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, Failure to obey lawful General Order by violation of the Commander, Seventh Fleet Liberty policy.

- 20030408 :       For violation of the UCMJ, Article 91, Insubordinate conduct toward a Petty Officer.

- 20030423 :       For violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, Failure to go to appointed place of duty.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 134 .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks to reenlist.
2.       The Applicant contends his youth and immaturity contributed to his misconduct.

Decision

Date : 20130205             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Absence without leave , 2 specifications ) , Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications) , Article 108 (Military property of the United States - Loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition) , and Article (General A rticle , 3 specifications : Specification s 1 -2 : Indecent assault and Specification 3: Indecent language ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised right to consult with a qualified counsel, but waived his rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative board . The Applicant was notified of separation proceedings for Commission of a Serious Offense and Pattern of Misconduct.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks to reenlist. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his youth and immaturity contributed to his misconduct. While the Applicant may feel his youth and immaturity were the underlying causes of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102172

Original file (ND1102172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a complete review of the Applicant’s service records and documentation he submitted, the NDRB determined the discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct Under Other Than Honorable Conditions was proper and equitable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801671

Original file (ND0801671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Supporting documentation to help support a post service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card company’s or other financial institutions;...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900238

Original file (ND0900238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requested an upgrade based on his record of service, however, he failed to provide any documentation for review. There are veteran’s organizations, such as the American Legion, willing to provide guidance to assist former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, theBoard found...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902265

Original file (ND0902265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. The Applicant could have produced evidence as stated in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the addendum with the full understanding that completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade.Relief denied.Summary: After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101402

Original file (ND1101402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900950

Original file (ND0900950.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a unanimous vote of 5-0, the Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions,” and the narrative reason for the discharge; “Misconduct,” shall remain as issued considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, theBoard found ADDENDUM: Information for...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500544

Original file (ND1500544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning, and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave; failure to be at appointed place of duty), Article 92 (Insubordinate conduct towards warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer; 2 specifications), Article 108 (Damaging government property; $500.00), Article 117 (Provoking speech or gestures; 2 specifications), Article (Failure to obey order or regulation; 8...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201161

Original file (ND1201161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a complete review of the documentation, the Applicant’s record of service, and the facts and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB determined that relief in the form of an upgrade to General (Under Honorable Conditions) was warranted. Full relief to Honorable was not granted, because the Applicant’s misconduct during his brief period of service warranted a Pattern of Misconduct separation, and the quality of his service did not meet the standard of acceptable conduct and...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300206

Original file (ND1300206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

With violations of UCMJ Articles 128 and 134, he met the requirements for administrative separation for Misconduct (Serious Offense).Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500327

Original file (MD1500327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, and for of the UCMJ: Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation; wrongfully consume alcohol under age 21), Article 129 (Burglary; unlawfully broke and entered barracks room of Cpl), and Article 134 (General article; 1 specification of indecent assault). Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200832

Similar Decisions