Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902265
Original file (ND0902265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ABH3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090814
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630605

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)                 Active:            19850911 - 19890705
                                             19890706 - 19911204
                                             19911205 - 19931015

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 19931016     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19970311      Highest Rank/Rate: ABH1
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 24 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: NFIR
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.22        (5.0)
         Performance: 4.0 ( 3 )     Behavior: 4.0 ( 3 )        OTA: 4.00         (4.0)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol (2) (2) (4 ) (2) (2) (4) (Kuwait) EAWS

Periods of CONF : 19961203- 19970121 ( 50 days )

NJP :

S CM :

SPCM: NFIR

GCM:
- 19961011 :      Article ( Indecent acts - 3 specifications )
         Article ( Adultery - 2 specifications )
         Sentence: 89 DAYS
         CA’s Action: Confinement in excess of 60 days is suspended for one year unless sooner vacated.
C C : NFIR

Retention Warning Counseling: NFIR








Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 850911 UNTIL 931015 ”
          “ 3630605 ”
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.


Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   



Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until 12 December 1997, Article 3630605, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 ( Indecent acts) .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1. The Applican t seeks to change his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Armed Forces.
1. The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because it was based on an isolated incident in 10 years of service .
 3. The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.
Decision
Date: 2010 0902 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included General Court-Martial (GCM) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Indecent acts - 3 specifications: Wrongfully commit an indecent act with an enlisted Sailor, by having intercourse with her while others were present) and Article (General Article ( Adultery) - 2 specifications: Wrongfully have sexual intercourse with an enlisted Sailor, a woman not his wife). The Applicant was not punitively discharge d from the N avy as a result of the GCM. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. T he NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant exercised or waived rights to c onsult with a qualified counsel and to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority . Per the separation code of GKQ on the Applicant’s DD Form 214 , the NDRB discerned that the Applicant appeared before an administrative separation board (ASB) and by a majority vote, the ASB determined that the preponderance of the evidence supported the misconduct and that he should be separated with a General discharge .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks to change his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Armed Forces. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because it was based on an isolated incident in 10 years of service. Despite a Sailor’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) is appropriate if the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance outweighs positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration. Besides showing continuous employment since his separation, he failed to provide any other documentary evidence on his behalf for post-service consideration. To warrant an upgrade the Applicant’s post - service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Applicant could have produced evidence as stated in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the addendum with the full understanding that completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Reenlistment/RE-code and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200921

    Original file (ND1200921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant provided no additional documentation for the NDRB’s consideration or to rebut the Government’s presumption of regularity that was not already documented in his official military record of service and medical record.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902314

    Original file (ND0902314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation. The Applicant was not awarded a punitive discharge but separated via the more lenient administrative discharge.After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901343

    Original file (ND0901343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000453

    Original file (ND1000453.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the NDRB reviewed MILPERSMAN section 1910-148, which provides details and guidance on administrative separations for homosexual misconduct, to determine whether the characterization of service was equitable based on the aforementioned misconduct and the Applicant’s totality of service during the enlistment period in which he was discharged. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000027

    Original file (ND1000027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since no other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged, a change would be inappropriate.Therefore, relief is denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101290

    Original file (ND1101290.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain UNSATPARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100304

    Original file (MD1100304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100779

    Original file (ND1100779.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant appeared before an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) on 09 July 2001. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001118

    Original file (ND1001118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decisional issues: The Applicant contends that his previous 15 years of honorable service were not considered by the administrative discharge board and do warrant consideration for upgrading the characterization of his service at discharge. On 07 August 2003, the Separation Authority approved the recommendation for separation, designating that the basis for separation be MISCONDUCT (Serious Offense) - having determined that the evidence of record supported both bases for discharge - and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902267

    Original file (ND0902267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant appeared before an Administrative Separation Board (ASB), who by a unanimous vote (3-0), determined that the preponderance of the evidence supported misconduct by reason of pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former...