Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201908
Original file (MD1201908.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120918
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20061026 - 20070603     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070604     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20110603      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 00 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 70
MOS: 2847/2822/8641
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle ( 2 )

Periods of CONF :

NJP:

- 20110311 :       Article (Absence without leave , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: On or about 20110309, at 1230, without authority, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointment place of duty, to wit: SNM failed to report to the Marston Pavilion for a Mandatory Battalion stand-down.
         Specification 2: On or about 20110309, at 1100, without authority, failed to go at the prescribed time to his ap pointed place of duty, to wit: SNM failed to report for remedial physical training.
         Article (Assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer , to wit: having received a lawful command from his warrant officer, his superior commissioned officer, then known by the said CWO2 ______ to be his superior commissioned officer, to attend to Remedial Conditioning Program, or words to that affect, did, on or about 20110308, willfully disobey by the same )
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer , to wit: on or about 20110309, was disrespectful in language toward a noncommissioned officer, then known by the said Sergeant ______ to be a noncommissioned officer who was then in execution of his office, by saying to him , “I’m not going to RCP” or words to that effect )
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20101210 :       For alcohol rehabilitation failure. Specifically, on 20101203, you reported to the Wilmington Treatment Center for alcohol treatment; however, you refused to remain in the facility to receive treatment.



- 20110311 :       For company l evel Non-Judicial Punishment on 20100311 and were awarded forfeiture o f ½ months pay for 1 month totaling $530.50 and 30 days restriction. The forfeiture of ½ months pay for 1 month totaling $530.50 and 16 days of restriction is suspended for a period of six months. Your conduct is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1600.19F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6209, ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist in the Marine Corps.
2.       The Applicant contends he was never admitted to an alcohol treatment facility.
3.       The Applicant contends he did not receive “correct legal processing . ”
4.       The Applicant contends his in-service conduct warrants an upgrade to Honorable.

Decision

 Date: 20 1 3 0701            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 2 specifications), Article 90 (Assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer), and Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer ) . Based on the Applicant’s alcohol rehabilitation failure, his command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised right to consult with a qualified counsel, but waived his right to submit a written statement.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist in the Marine Corps. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was never admitted to an alcohol treatment facility. Paragraph 6209 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual states that a Marine who has been referred to a program of rehabilitation for personal alcohol abuse and/or dependency may be separated for failure through inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program . The Applicant’s service record shows the Applicant was ordered to report to the Wilmington Treatment Center for inpatient treatment of alcohol abuse, but he refused to remain in the facility to receive full treatment. The Applicant did not submit any documentation to rebut any presumption of regularity in governmental affairs by the NDRB. The NDRB determined his discharge for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure was warranted and proper. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he did not receive “correct legal processing . ” A complete review of the records shows the Applicant received full due process and all applicable rights. He met the requirements for separation processing for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure and was afforded all applicable rights during the separation process. With his misconduct of record, his command recommended a very equitable characterization of General, even though he also met the requirements for administrative separation for Misconduct (Serious Offense) and an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service. Relief denied.



4 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contend s his in-service conduct warrants an upgrade to Honorable. The Applicant was administratively separated and not separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation. The characterization of service is determined by the quality of the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment, including the reason for separation. Other considerations shall be given to the member’s length of service, grade, aptitude, and physical and mental condition. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of his service record, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500639

    Original file (MD0500639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. It is obvious that Lance Corporal W_ (Applicant) after serving two years and six months in the Marine Corps, can only be relied on to perform his duties if he is under immediate supervision. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20030429 with a general (under honorable conditions) character of service due to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201646

    Original file (MD1201646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Relief denied.Summary:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00244

    Original file (MD03-00244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    st MEB] directed the Applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19930303 under honorable conditions (general) due to alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201399

    Original file (MD1201399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of his conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of his service record, and the awarded characterization of service was warranted and completely in line with what others received with similar records.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600222

    Original file (MD0600222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the attached document/letter to the Board: “ To Whom it May Concern:My narrative reason for separation/separation code and reentry code should be changed because at that particular time in my life leading up to my discharge I was going through a two week period in my life were issues at home was becoming a burden on me mentally. It’s with this testimony I respectfully submit my request to have the following items on my DD214 changed to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01230

    Original file (MD03-01230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue, and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. ” Documentation In addition to the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000267

    Original file (MD1000267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00402

    Original file (MD03-00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00402 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030109. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Showing up to work drunk on 991019, screened by the medical officer on 991021 and SACC, diagnosed as being alcohol dependent and refusing to attend alcohol treatment as recommended by the SACC.]

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1401569

    Original file (MD1401569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. A preponderance of the evidence reviewed supports the conclusion that the Applicant was an alcohol rehabilitation failure, that separation from the Naval Service was appropriate, and that a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge was warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902479

    Original file (MD0902479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTAPPLICANT’S ISSUES 1. An upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a...