Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201646
Original file (MD1201646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120801
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: NO LONGER MEDICALLY QUALIFIED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19960518 - 19960827     Active:            19960828 - 20001009

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20001010     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20020312      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 03 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
MOS: 6252
Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (3) CoC LoA

Periods of CONF :

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20010718 :      For unauthorized absence on 20010709 until 20010 711 (3 days) and assignment to Substance Abuse Recovery Department L evel III Point Loma San Diego, CA on 20010723.
- 20020205 :      For unauthorized absence on 20020114 until 20020116 (3days) and your reassignment to SARD L evel III on 20011015.

- 20011004 :       For unauthorized absence on 20011004 for 24 hrs and alcohol relapse on 20011002.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:
         
“CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 960828 UNTIL 001009 ”
Block 29, Dates of Time Lost During This Period: “20010709-20010711 (3), 20020114-20020116 (3) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.





Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1600.19F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6209, ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for employment opportunities.
2.       The Applicant contends h is entire military service and achievements were not taken into consideration .
3.       The Applicant contends his misconduct was mitigated by a developing mood disorder that he was unaware of.

Decision

 Date: 20 1 3 0509            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings . Based on the misconduct and multiple admissions and subsequent failures at alcohol inpatient treatment facilities , command administratively processed for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for employment opportunities. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his entire military service and achievements were not taken into consideration. The Applicant received an Honorable discharge for his first enlistment from August 1996 until October 2000. Each period of enlistment is an independent obligation and characterization is determined for that specific period of time. During the Applicant’s second enlistment, he received three retention counseling warnings related to periods of unauthorized absence and alcohol-related incidents. According to the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, Paragraph 6209, ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE , “ A Marine who has been referred to a program of rehabilitation for personal alcohol abuse and/or dependency may be separated for failure through inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program in the following circumstances: a. There is a lack of potential for continued naval service or b . Long - term rehabilitation is determined necessary and the Marine is transferred to a civilian medical facility for rehabilitation. ” The Applicant’s record reflects a relapse with alcohol abuse/dependency after completion of his first inpatient treatment. He was given a second chance by his command and sent a second time to inpatient alcohol treatment from which he again met the requirements for separation after he went UA and used alcohol. An Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service generally meets the standard of acceptable conduct and performance for Naval personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization of service would be clearly inappropriate. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is warranted when the quality of the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. After a complete review of the 17 months of the Applicant’s second enlistment, the NDRB determined his discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.





: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his misconduct was mitigated by a developing mood disorder that he was unaware of. When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the NDRB does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition or diagnosis to be of sufficient nature to excuse the Applicant’s misconduct. There is nothing in the record to suggest that the Applicant was not responsible for his actions or should not be held accountable for his misconduct and alcohol abuse. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201908

    Original file (MD1201908.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20061026 - 20070603Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070604Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110603Highest Rank:Length of Service: Years Months00 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:70MOS: 2847/2822/8641Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002241

    Original file (MD1002241.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Applicant completed two...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301269

    Original file (MD1301269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s alcohol rehabilitation failure, command administratively processed for separation. After considering the Applicant’s record of service in his current enlistment, the Separation Authority determined he met the bases of separation for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure and Pattern of Misconduct and further determined the primary basis for separation should be Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure with an Under Honorable Conditions (General) characterization of service. ”...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300957

    Original file (MD1300957.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for 15 years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00370

    Original file (MD01-00370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00370 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010131, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. I have served two periods of service from 1986 to 1990 in the U.S. Navy which I receive an Honorable discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901000

    Original file (MD0901000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00402

    Original file (MD03-00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00402 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030109. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Showing up to work drunk on 991019, screened by the medical officer on 991021 and SACC, diagnosed as being alcohol dependent and refusing to attend alcohol treatment as recommended by the SACC.]

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301695

    Original file (MD1301695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regulations require mandatory processing for administrative separation if a service member is determined to be an alcohol rehabilitation failure. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000545

    Original file (MD1000545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on documentation found in the Applicant’s medical records, the NDRB determined the Applicant met the criteria for separation as an “Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure” and was processed for administrative separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00244

    Original file (MD03-00244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    st MEB] directed the Applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19930303 under honorable conditions (general) due to alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable...