Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200976

Original file (MD1200976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120327

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20070703 - 20070916     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070917     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20100315      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 29 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 33
MOS: 3533
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle ( 2 ) KDSM

Periods of CONF :

NJP:
- 20081110 :       Article (General A rticle - requested a PFC to steal a bandana from the E xchange )
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20091217 :       Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20091230 :       Article (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer)
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Article 134 (General A rticle - broke the rules and guidelines for restriction assigned by LtCol )
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:
- 20091209 :       Art icle (Failure to obey order or regulation , 3 specifications )
         Specification 1: Failed to log out in liberty logbook
         Specification 2: Not wearing the appropriate uniform of the day and consuming alcohol
         Specification 3: Consuming alcohol
         Article 95 (Resistance, flight, breach of arrest, and escape)
         Article 108 (Military property of the United States - sale, loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition)
         Article 117 (Provoking speeches or gestures)
         Article 134 (General A rticle , 3 specifications )
         Specifications 1-2: Disorderly conduct, drunkenness
         Specification 3: Used indecent language
         Sentence :

SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20081110 :       For violation of Article 134.

- 20091117 :       For your involvement in alcohol - related incident s on 20091023 and 20091108.

- 20091223 :       For disobeying a direct order to be at the Regimental field for an accountability formation at 1145, 20091215. Applicant was UA from his appointed place of duty. Applicant displayed insubordinate conduct toward an NCO while being questioned about the incident. Applicant was informed that this type of action in his Marine Corps career may cause adverse reaction regarding retention .

- 20091230 :       For violation of Articles 89, 91 , and 134.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends he was treated unfairly by his lieutenant .
2.       The Applicant contends he was not properly informed where and when he was required to be , which led to him being UA.
3.       The Applicant contends his post-service mental health outpatient treatment is worthy of an upgrade.

Decision

Date: 20130205          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Absence without leave) , Article (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer) , Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer , 2 specifications ) , Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) , and Article 134 (General A rticle , 2 specifications : Specification 1: R equested a PFC to steal a bandana from the E xchange and Specification 2: Broke the rules and guidelines for restriction assigned by LtCol) , and for of the UCMJ: Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 3 specifications : Specification 1: Failed to log out in liberty logbook, Specification 2: Not wearing the appropriate uniform of the day and consuming alcohol, and Specification 3: Consuming alcohol), Article 95 (Resistance, flight, breach of arrest, and escape), Article 108 (Military property of the United States - sale, loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition), Article 117 (Provoking speeches or gestures), and Article 134 (General A rticle, 3 specifications : Specifications 1-2: Disorderly conduct, drunkenness and Specification 3: Used indecent language). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation . When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was treated unfairly by his lieutenant. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support his contention the command , or the newly commissioned lieutenant, treated him unfairly. The Applicant’s service over 2 ½ years included significant misconduct , including violations of UCMJ Article s 86, 89, 91, 92, 95, 108, 117 , and 134 . Violations of UCMJ Article s 89, 91, 92, 95, 10 8 , and 134 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge (i.e., Bad Conduct) is authorized. His command, however, opted for the more lenient administrative discharge. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was not properly informed where and when he was required to be , which led to him being UA. The record of evidence clearly shows the Applicant waived his right to trial by court-martial and accepted NJP for the Article 86 violation. If the Applicant felt he was mistakenly charged with a crime, it was his obligation to contest those charges at the time they were made , either at NJP or a court-martial . The Applicant submitted no evidence to support his contention, therefore, the NDRB must rely upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of Government affairs. In addition to the Article 86 violation, the Applicant was found guilty of violating UCMJ Article s 89, 91, 92, 95, 108, 117, and 134 and clearly met the requirements for separation due to a Pattern of Misconduct. The NDRB determined the Applicant was properly and equitably discharged. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service mental health outpatient treatment is worthy of an upgrade. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a mental health outpatient treatment certificate. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. The Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001589

Original file (MD1001589.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201698

Original file (MD1201698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20061216 - 20070102Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070103Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100323Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)21 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:79MOS: 2844Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200491

Original file (MD1200491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

During his less than three years in the Marine Corps, he received four retention warnings and was found guilty of numerous UCMJ violations at four NJPs, all of which occurred before his return from Afghanistan in January 2010. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300837

Original file (ND1300837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400787

Original file (MD1400787.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102132

Original file (MD1102132.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100604

Original file (ND1100604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service during her enlistment period reflects one NAVPERS 1070/613 retention-counseling warning being issued. Furthermore, the Applicant’s service record documents four nonjudicial punishments (NJPs) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), specifically: Article 86 (Absent without leave, 4 specifications of unauthorized absence); Article 87 (Missing movement); Article 89 (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer); Article 91...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101250

Original file (ND1101250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to increase employment opportunities. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600922

Original file (MD0600922.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MD06-00922 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060628. Decisional Issues Equity – Youth, alcohol problemEquity – Post service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19920316 - 19920413 COG Active: None Period of...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400292

Original file (MD1400292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning, for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 90 (Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer, 1 specification), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, 1 specification), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications), Article 112 (Drunk on duty, 1 specification), Article 117 (Provoking speeches or gestures, 1...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200976

Similar Decisions