Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102132
Original file (MD1102132.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110920
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
        
Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20020219 - 20020224     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20020225     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20050916      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 22 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 77
MOS: 6257
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( 13 ) / ( 13 )        Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Lost time per DD214: 20050415 - 20050526, 42 days

NJP:

- 20040415 :      Article 86 ( Absence without leave, to wit: Failed to return to work from rifle range on or about 20040405 and 20040506)
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward w arrant o fficer, n oncommissioned o fficer, or p etty o fficer)
         Article (General A rticle, to wit: False or unauthorized pass offense)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20040422:      Article (Assaulting or willfully disobeying Superior Commissioned Officer)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

- 20050303 :      Article (Insubordinate conduct toward Warrant Officer, Noncommissioned Officer, or Petty Officer, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Disobeying a lawful order given by a Non-Commissioned Officer
         Specification 2: Treatment of a Non-Commissioned Officer with contempt/disrespect
         Article 108: (Military property of United States - Loss, Damage, Destruction, or Wrongful Disposition)
         Article 134 (General A rticle, to wit: Communicating a threat)
         Sentence: (20050303-20050326, 24 days)

- 20050609 :      Article (Absence without leave) [Extracted from Staff Judge Advocate Brief Sheet-Administrative Discharge undated]
         Sentence:

SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20040510 :      For violation of a lawful order and unauthorized absence from restriction.

- 20050212 :      For violating A rticles 86, 91, and 134 of the UCMJ. During the recent liberty port in San Diego, California you were drunk and disrespectful while at a local restaurant and when ask ed for identification by the Shore Patrol (Chief Petty Officer) , you denied being a Marine and failed to report to the ship before curfew. O n 11 February 2005 while embarked aboard the USS Carl Vinson you were disrespectful to a Master At Arms while he was performing his duties transporting prisoners to chow. After receiving counseling for this incident , you were disrespectful to several Staff Non Commissioned Officers in both your tone and language. You later communicated a threat to do bodily harm to the Maintenance Chief. You have received several counseling s by you r SNCOIC and OIC being involved in an incident that set fire in a F ederal park, disrespect toward a n SNCO, disobeying orders, reckless driving , and i mproper identification card.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant requests an upgrade to qualify for education benefits and enhance his employment opportunities.
2.       The Applicant contends his post - service accomplishments are worthy of consideration.
3.       The Applicant contends his command treated him unfairly , harassed him, and failed to assess his medical and psychological problems.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 1009            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave , 1 specification), Article 90 ( Assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, 1 specification), Article 91 ( Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, non-commissioned officer, or petty officer , 1 specific ation ) , and Article 134 (General A rticle - False or unauthorized pass offense, 1 specification) , and for of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 1 specification), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, non-commissioned officer, or petty officer, 1 specification), Article 108 (Military property of United States - Loss, Damage, Destruction, or Wrongful Disposition, 1 specif i cation), and Article 134 (General A rticle, to wit: Communicating a threat, 1 specification). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant , in writing, exercised right to consult with a qualified counsel but waived his rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative board . After review by the Separation Authority and his Staff Judge Advocate, the Applicant was separated Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for a Pattern of Misconduct.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant requests an upgrade to qualify for education benefits and enhance his employment opportunities. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post - service accomplishments are worthy of consideration. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a character reference from his current L icensed C linical S ocial W orker whom he sees regularly, a letter of appreciation from a univer sity, and documentation from his current VA medical appointments. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. To warrant an upgrade, the Applicant’s post-service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.


: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his command treated him unfairly , harassed him, and failed to assess his medical and psychological problems. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention the command treated him unfairly , harassed him, or failed to assess his medical and psychological problems . After a complete review of the Applicant’s records, there is nothing to indicate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or should not be held accountable for his misconduct. What the record does reveal is very low Proficiency and Conduct marks of 3.9/3.8 over the course of his 3 years and 7 months of service, two retention warnings, two NJPs, and two summary courts-martial for numerous instances of misconduct that included serious offenses ( Articles 90, 91, 108, and134 ) . Misconduct of this nature often results in a punitive discharge (i.e., Bad Conduct) as the result of a Special Court-Martial. However, his command opted for the more lenient administrative discharge process. The NDRB determined that an upgrade is not warranted. Relief denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100309

    Original file (ND1100309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Applicant could have...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401024

    Original file (MD1401024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301265

    Original file (MD1301265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301821

    Original file (ND1301821.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301472

    Original file (MD1301472.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review solely to a determination of the propriety and the equity of a discharge.Issue 2: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200842

    Original file (ND1200842.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specification 2: Disrespectful language toward a Warrant Officer.Awarded: Suspended: [Extracted from Evaluation report and Counseling Record dated 20100925]SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention Warning Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000172

    Original file (ND1000172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Nondecisional issues:(1) Applicant seeks relief in the form of an upgrade in discharge characterization of service in order to obtain Montgomery G.I. This issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief; there is no requirement or law that grants the NDRB the authority to re-characterize discharges based solely on the issue of obtaining...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101250

    Original file (ND1101250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to increase employment opportunities. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900201

    Original file (ND0900201.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.Besides the Applicant DD Form 293, no documentation was provided for further review. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801139

    Original file (ND0801139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT - . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted,...