Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200278

Original file (MD1200278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20111115

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19980826 - 19980908     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19980909     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20040603      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 25 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 21
MOS: 3531
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

I n Hands of Civil Authorities: 20021106-20021107, 2 days
Lost time per DD214: 19991008-19991011, 3 days; 20000327-20000328 , 2 days

NJP:
- 19991015 : No details found in record [Extracted from Record of Trial]

- 20000331 : No details found in record [Extracted from Record of Trial]

- 20000414 : No details found in record [Extracted from Record of Trial]

- 20000913 :      Article (Absence without leave, 2359, 20000611 to 0900, 20000828, 78 days)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20010223 :       Article (Absence without leave, 0645-1030, 20011208)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, disobey MSgt order to be at work at 1300)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20010125 : Article (Absence without leave, 1530, 20011230 to 0700, 20020107, 8 days)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SPCM:
- 20021212 :       Art icle (Absence without leave, 20020405-20021106, 215 days)
         Sentence : CONF 90 days (Pre-trial: 20021107-20021211, 34 days)
         CA: The sentence is approved and, except for the bad conduct discharge, will be executed, but the execution of that part of the sentence extending to all confinement in excess of seventy-five (75) days is suspended for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of this action, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended portion will be remitted without further action.

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19991209 :       For violation of A rticle 86 and other related incident, blatant disregard for the Marine Corps Regulations, to include MCB Regulations. Specifically, unauthorized absence from 2000, 19991008 and remained absent until 0900, 19991012, as a result you were subject to Company level NJP and found guilty of violation of Article 86, 19991025 UA from rifle range detail, 19991117 UA from PT formation, 19991118 UA from rifle range detail. As a result, suspended punishment from your Company level NJP was vacated. 19991130 UA from work section for two hours, you were discovered in your barracks room and were found to have attempted Suicide Ideations. You received medical attention and psychiatric counseling and found fit for duty on 19991201. On 19991202 UA from field day inspection and 19991206 UA from platoon PT.

- 20011119 :       For being absent from appointed place of duty and disobedience of a lawful order, which demonstrates a pattern of misconduct and frequent involvement with military authorities.

SCM:     CC:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends a Bad Conduct Discharge could have been avoided if he was granted emergency leave or transferred to a different battalion.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 1126 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety . The Applicant ’ s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Absence without leave, 3 specifications ) and Article (Failure to obey order or regulation) , and for of the UCMJ: Article (Absence without leave, 20020405-20021106, 215 days). The Applicant was convicted at a special court-martial and was separated from the Marine Corps with a Bad Conduct D ischarge.

: ( D ecisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends a Bad Conduct Discharge could have been avoided if he was granted emergency leave or transfe rred to a different battalion. During the Applicant’s brief service, he received two 6105 counseling warnings and was found guilty of numerous UCMJ violations at six nonjudicial punishments and a special court-martial. Although the Applicant provided no details on his contention that he was denied emergency leave, this does not justify the numerous Article 86 violations, including a 215-day period of unauthorized absence. Further, being retained in his assigned unit does not justify the numerous instances of misconduct committed by the Applicant. He could have avoided a court-martial if he followed the orders given to him and conducted his duties in an appropriate manner. The NDRB found no basis for which to grant clemency in this case. Clemency denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700075

Original file (MD0700075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.20020627: Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at NJP dated 20020529.20020712: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Violation Article 86 x 2x. (20021106) SJA review (date): (20021107)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, 2D FORCE SERVICE SUPPORT GROUP (20021108) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700897

Original file (ND0700897.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by three retention warnings and three nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order), and Article 111 (Drunken operation of a vehicle. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801454

Original file (MD0801454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101211

Original file (ND1101211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. In lieu of the full...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800153

Original file (ND0800153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901701

Original file (ND0901701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the Applicant met the requirements for separation by reason of misconduct – commission of a serious offense and the awarded characterization of service was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101045

Original file (ND1101045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901327

Original file (MD0901327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The NDRB determined the awarded character of service was warranted and the narrative reason for discharge was appropriate.The Applicant provided no documentation or further evidence in support of his request to be upgrade to “Honorable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900130

Original file (MD0900130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

2.Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700777

Original file (ND0700777.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the Applicant's undocumented claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. NOT FOUND IN RECORD Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200278

Similar Decisions