Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901327
Original file (MD0901327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090414
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19981203 - 19990406     Ina ctive:         USAR- 19970613 – 19970823 NFIR
                                                                        USA -19980528- UNKNOWN NFIR
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19990407     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19991008      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 02 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 52
MOS: 9971
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA : 19990901 – 19991008 (37 days)

NJP:
- 1999 0817 :       Article 86 (UA) 1200 , 19990815 – 1600, 19990815 ( 4 hours )
         Awarded : Susp ended:

SCM:    SPCM:   CC:     Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
DD 214:      Service / Medical Record: Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:         From Representat ion :   From Congress member :
Other Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August1995 until 31 August 2001, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Discharge characterization was too harsh for his misconduct.
2. Youth, immaturity, and p ersonal family problems mitigated his misconduct.

Decision

 Date: 2010 0107            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included non-judicial punishment ( ) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Unauthorized absence, 4 hours) , plus another unauthorized absence of 37 days from 19990901 to 19991008 , which was not adjudicated . The Applicant was not available to sign his DD-214, because he was UA during his time of discharge. According to the DD-214, when notified for administrative separation processing, the Applicant waived rights to request an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his characterization was too harsh for his misconduct. The Applicant’s statements alone do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The Applicant was provided the opportunity to present h is case to an administrative discharge board, but waived that right . Based upon available records, nothing indicates the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of disciplin e in the United States Navy. The NDRB determined the awarded character of service was warranted and the narrative reason for discharge was appropriate. The Applicant provided no documentation or further evidence in support of his request to be upgrade to “Honorable. ”

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade due to his youth, immaturity, and personal family problems, which led to his misconduct. Along with the DD Form 293, the Applicant provided a statement , but no other documentation to support his case. The NDRB recognizes that many of our servicemembers are young at the time they enlist for service but still manage to serve honorably. While we understand some members may be less mature than others, the NDRB does not view a member’s claim of youth or immaturity to be mitigating factors or sufficient reasons for misconduct.

The Applicant stated that he married his fiancée after boot camp, but did not provide any documentation. The NDRB could not determine how his marital problems were connected to his fraudulent entry into the Marine Corps.

 Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, “characterization of service under other than honorable conditions may only be issued when the fraud involves concealment of a prior separation in which service was not characterized as honorable (the administrative board procedure of paragraph 6304 must be used if characterization under other then honorable conditions is desired). ” The NDRB found documentation that the Applicant had served in the U.S. Army reserves from 13 June 1997 to 23 August 1997, but could not determine the characterization received. Since the Board could not fully evaluate the Applicant’s fraudulent entry into the Marine Corps, t he NDRB relies on a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any documented evidence for the Board’s consideration, to support the contention the Applicant deserves an upgrade in characterization. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400249

    Original file (ND1400249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801454

    Original file (MD0801454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000693

    Original file (MD1000693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801919

    Original file (ND0801919.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700542

    Original file (MD0700542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19960826 - 19960908 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960909Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:19991223Length of Service: 03 Yrs 03 Mths 14 DysLost Time:Days UA: 2Days Confined: 16Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601105

    Original file (MD0601105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-Pvt, USMCMD06-01105Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060815Narrative Reason for Separation: COURT-MARTIALCharacter of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 1105Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: MWSS-371 MWSG-37 3DMAW MCAS YUMA AZApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070706 Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200278

    Original file (MD1200278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB found no basis for which to grant clemency in this case. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000823

    Original file (MD1000823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001362

    Original file (MD1001362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19960624 - 19960721Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19960722Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19991101Highest Rank:Length of Service: Years Months11 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:35MOS: 0331Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800569

    Original file (ND0800569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19990602–19990603Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990603Period of enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19990901Length of Service: 00 Yrs 02Mths29 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 31Highest Rank/Rate:E-3Evaluation marks:Performance: NONE Behavior:NONEOTA: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle Pistol Periods of...