Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101462

Original file (ND1101462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ABHAR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110524

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3640420 [COURT-MARTIAL]

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19931221 - 19940814     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19940815     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19980429      Highest Rank/Rate: ABHA A
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 03 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 46
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):               Periods of UA/CONF:      UA 19950621 - 19950626 (5 days)
                                             UA 19950819 - 19950912 (24 days)
                                             UA 19950725 - 19950812 (18 days)
                                             UA 19951030 - 19951101 (3 days)
                                             UA 19951114 - 19960516 (184 days)
NJP :

- 19950723 :      Article (Absence without leave , UA, 19950621 - 19950626 ) , 5 days
         Awarded: (to E-1) Suspended: (suspend 6 months)

S CM :    CC:               Retention Warning Counseling :

SPCM:

- 19960618 :       Art icle (Absence without leave, 4 specifications)
                  Specification 1: 19950819 to 19950912, 2 4 days
                  Specification 2: 19951030 to 19951101, 3 days
                  Specification 3: 19950725 to 19950812, 1 8 days
                  Specification 4: 19951114 to 19960516, 184 days
         Art icle (Missing movement on 19950828)
         Sentence : BCD CONF ( 90 days ) RIR (to E-1)

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ COURT-MARTIAL ”
         950725-950812 (18), 950819-951112 (24), 951030-951101 (3), 951114-960516 (184), 960516-950601 (15), 960812-980429 (623)

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 19 96 until
14 December 1998, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE
OF COURT-MARTIAL

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Applicant contends his post-discharge diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder and Bi p olar Disorder mitigate the miscondu ct for which he was separated.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 08 02 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant ’ s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant ’ s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue for the Board ’s consi deration . T he Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention warnings, but it did reflect for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave , UA, 21-26 June 1995, 5 days). The record also revealed for of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Absence without leave , UA, 4 specifications: 25 July-12 August 1995, 18 days; 19 August-12 September 1995, 24 days; 30 October-1 November 1995, 3 days; and 14 November 1995 -16 May 1996, 184 days ) , and Article 87 (Missing movement, 28 August 1995, USS America deployment to the Mediterranean Sea ) . The record also revealed the Applicant obtained an enlistment waiver for a non-minor misdemeanor charge of criminal damage to property during his enlistment accession processing . Based on the serious and repeated offense(s) committed by the Applicant while in service , his command referred him for trial by S pecial C ourt- M artial. Upon completion of the appellate review process (20 January 1998) and affirmation of the court- martial findings and sentence approved by the Convening Authority, the Applicant was separated from the Navy with a Bad Conduct Discharge due to Court-Martial.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-discharge diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder and Bi p olar Disorder mitigate the misconduct for which he was separated. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. In support of his issue, t he Applicant submitted character reference letters and a physician verification letter that stat ed the Applicant was being treated for Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder (not otherwise specified). While he may feel this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his misconduct was willful and repetitive and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or he should not be held accountable for his actions . After careful consideration of all the available evidence, to include the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined this issue did not provide a basis for which clemency could be granted. Clemency denied .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and the punitive d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000606

Original file (ND1000606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00943

Original file (MD03-00943.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I DESERVE a bad conduct discharge that I was given in my trial, and wish that I could come back and earn an Honorable discharge without changing this one. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19960516 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial.
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100004

Original file (ND1100004.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s service records to determine whether his discharge met the standards of propriety and equity at the time of discharge and whether his post-service achievements warrant a discharge upgrade. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800537

Original file (MD0800537.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902007

Original file (ND0902007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Bad Conduct Discharge”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided, clemency would be inappropriateSummary:After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101033

Original file (MD1101033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the medical and service records are incomplete, available evidence indicates the Applicant was administratively processed for separation due to Personality Disorder. Accordingly, the Board found that relief was warranted on the basis of equity, and the characterization of service will be changed to Honorable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900370

Original file (ND0900370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Discharged while mentally ill and never received treatment or screening for bipolar disorder with psychotic features. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000765

Original file (MD1000765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge in administrative separations or clemency in the case of a court-martial-awarded punitive discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, Special Court-Martial Record of Trial and punitive discharge process, the Board found the discharge was equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700260

Original file (MD0700260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense that he committed. 95-1930 Applicant Discharged: 19951101 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period:...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900549

Original file (ND0900549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101462

Similar Decisions