Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900549
Original file (ND0900549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-sr, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090112
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3620200

 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19950825 - 19951101     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19951102     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19951204      Highest Rank/Rate: SR
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 03 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 50
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR   OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 23 June 1996, Article 3620200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Reenlistment opportunity.
2. Immaturity at time of discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 0402             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraph concerning , regarding this Issue.
: ( ) . The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade because his immaturity led to his discharge. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. For the edification of the Applicant, he was discharged with an “Uncharacterized” discharge for “Personality Disorder” based on his diagnosis with Impulse Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder on 26 November 1995. An “Uncharacterized” discharge is directed in all cases of separation within a Sailor’s first 180 days of continuous active duty service unless extraordinary circumstances are involved. Furthermore, the Applicant should be aware that, with respect to non-service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an “Uncharacterized” separation is considered the equivalent of an “Honorable” or “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” discharge. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001558

    Original file (ND1001558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRBpresumesregularity in that he was recommended for expeditious administrative separation, which would not have required the Applicant to be counseled for having a personality disorder or time to overcome it.The Applicant’s post-service mental health evaluation and diagnosis of PTSD due to MST was conducted more than 14 years 9 months after being separated and has no bearing on the in-service diagnosis.The Board determined that the Narrative Reason for Separation reflects...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101364

    Original file (ND1101364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.2. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain PERSONALITY...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901218

    Original file (ND0901218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ), an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found However, based on the fact the condition was preexisting and discharge notification was made to the Applicant within the first 180 days of his enlistment, the awarded characterization of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700490

    Original file (ND0700490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, there was no justification for upgrading the Applicant’s characterization of discharge based on a material change in the law.Issue3 (Propriety):The Applicant further contends that he was incorrectly diagnosed,by the Navy,as having a Personality Disorder.His claim andrequest for the narrative reason be changed to Adjustment Disorder is based on a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder,made by his psychologist, one year prior to Applicant’s enlistment into Navy. Discharge Process Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902105

    Original file (ND0902105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:I WANT TO JOIN THE RESERVES PLEASE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19981120 - 19981129Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19981130Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19981215Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 56EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700662

    Original file (ND0700662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found no reason to change the Applicant’s characterization of service. Discharge Process Date Notified: 19950630Reason for Discharge: - ADJUSTMENT DISORDER Least Favorable Characterization: GENERAL Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19950630 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): CO, RECRUIT TRAINING...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801777

    Original file (ND0801777.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved; an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100004

    Original file (ND1100004.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s service records to determine whether his discharge met the standards of propriety and equity at the time of discharge and whether his post-service achievements warrant a discharge upgrade. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900223

    Original file (ND0900223.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a reentry (RE)code change to RE-1.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years ofthe Applicant’sdate of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800457

    Original file (ND0800457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: MEDICAL CONDITION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19860116 - 19861027Active: 19861028 – 19900830 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19900831Period of enlistment:4 Years+ 2 month extensionDate of Discharge:19931021Length of Service: 03 Yrs 01Mths21 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:22AFQT: 78Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.4 (6) Behavior:3.4 (6)OTA:...