Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101249
Original file (ND1101249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ISSN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110419
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630650 [in lieu of trial by court martial]

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:       CONVENIENCE OF THE NAVY

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19870313 - 19870504     Active:   19870505 - 19911230 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19911231     Age at Enlistment: 23
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19961227      Highest Rank/Rate: IS2
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 29 D a ys
Education Level: 12      AFQT: 78
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 1.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 2.57

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol EX SSDR NAVY “ E ” (3) GCM (2) AFEM, JMUA (3), NDSM, CGSOS R

Periods of C ONF :

NJP : 1
- 19960408 :      Article 86 (Absence without leave)
         Article 107 (False official statement)
         Awarded: L ETTER OF REPRIMAND Suspended:

S CM : NONE SPCM: NONE C C : NONE Retention Warning Counseling : NONE

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB note d an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

          “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 19870505 UNTIL 19911230 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
          From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends that his discharge is too harsh in light of his mitigating in - service medical/mental health pr oblems.
2.       The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.
Decision

Date: 20 1 2 0913             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave) and Article 107 (False official statement). Facing charges at a Special Court-Martial for violation of Article 132 (Frauds against the United States, collec ting married BAH while single), the Applicant submitted a request for separation in lieu of trial by court-martial. The C onvening A uthority approved the Applicant’s request and separated him with a character of service of Under Ot her Than Honorable Conditions.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that his discharge is too harsh in light of his mitigating in-service medical/mental health problems. When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. However, the Board generally does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition, the implied incorrect diagnosis, nor the medical treatment given to the Applicant to be of sufficient nature to exculpate the misconduct. The NDRB i s not convinced that medical/mental health problems were a contributing factor to the Applicant’s misconduct or mitigate his misconduct. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the to maintain proper order and discipline. Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial warrants processing for administrative separation regardless of grade, performance, or time in service. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant’s discharge was equitable and consistent with the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under re view. The Applicant provided evidence of contin uous employment, a letter of recommendation from his employer, criminal background check, evidence of community service, evidence of college attendance and completion, evidence of home ownership , a personal statement, and character references. Although the Applicant provided much of the documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , completion of th ose items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration . Besides the charge violating Article 132 of the UCMJ, for which he requested separation instead of facing trial by court-martial, he also had an NJP for violating Article 86 and 107 of the UCMJ. The Board was not convinced that the Applicant ’s post - service conduct demonstrated that his in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the seriousness of the offenses he committed. Relief denied.





Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . Since fifteen years from the date of the Applicant’s discharge have elapsed, he is not eligible for a personal appearance hearing with the NDRB. The Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490, for further review using DD Form 149.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until 11 December 1997, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .
C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902412

    Original file (ND0902412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6B (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS), effective 13 December 1999 until 14 December 2005 establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 March 1997.B. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300728

    Original file (ND1300728.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700282

    Original file (ND0700282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19900209 - 19900411Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19900412Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19920221 Length of Service: 01Yrs 10Mths09 DysLost Time:Days UA: 1Education Level: Age at Enlistment:19AFQT: 41Highest Rank/Rate:FAEvaluation marks (# of occasions): Performance: 3.4 Behavior: 3.2 OTA: 3.6 (2)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):SOUTHWEST ASIA SERVICE MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700304

    Original file (MD0700304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19881021 - 19890625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19890626Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19920609 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11Mths14 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700171

    Original file (MD0700171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that Discussion Issue 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19880514 - 19880906 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19880907Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:19911230 Length of Service: 3 Yrs 2Mths26 DysLost Time:Days...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700252

    Original file (ND0700252.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service,was marred by two brief periods of Unauthorized Absence, one retention warning, one nonjudicial punishment for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 123a [Uttering checks without sufficient funds (4 specifications)], and the commission of a serious offense (Armed Robbery). Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700488

    Original file (ND0700488.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Applicant met the requirements for separation processing due to drug abuse by testing positive on a unit sweep urinalysis. There is, however, evidence in the record that the Applicant waived his right to consult with counsel and waived his right to an Administrative Board during the administrative discharge process.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001156

    Original file (MD1001156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, documents and testimony given by the Applicant and the resignation in lieu of trial discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000766

    Original file (ND1000766.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a change to RE code and a discharge upgrade to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.2. After careful consideration of the documentary evidence submitted by the Applicant and the specific circumstances surrounding the misconduct for which he was separated, the Board determined that his post-service achievementsdid not provide a basis for which relief could be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001577

    Original file (ND1001577.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. In order to warrant...