Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001156
Original file (MD1001156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MAJ, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100407
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: RES
Authority for Discharge: SECNAVINST 1920.6C

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         NROTC     19870811 - 19920409     Active:   R 19920410 - 19980713 HON
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Appointment : 19980714     Age: 29
Years Contracted : Indefinite
Date of Discharge: 20070430       Highest Rank : MAJ
 Length of Service: 08 Year(s) Month(s) 16 D ay(s)
Education Level:        
Officer’s Fitness reports: Available
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol (2) (2) NMUC (2)

Period of UA 20061218-20061231, 13 days CONF : The record indicates pre-trial confinement starting on 20061231

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:   CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date):        20080327
NDRB Documentary Review Docket Number:   MD08-00541
NDRB Documentary Review Findings:                 Proper as issued and that no change is warranted.
Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:   

         “ SECNAVINST 1920.6C ”
         20061218-20061231

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 15 December 2005 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 Mar 97

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Applicant contends his misconduct was an isolated incident in 15 years of service with no disciplinary action.
2.       Applicant seeks an upgrade based on post-service achievements.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 0504            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall RES .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied two decisional issues for the Board ’s consideration . T he Board co nducted a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any 6105 retention warnings, commanding officer nonjudicial punishments (NJP), or trial by courts-martial. However, the record did reflect the Applicant had been referred to trial by punitive court-martial for violations of t he Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 18 Dec-31 Dec 2006, terminated by apprehension at a local hospital ), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order, regulation, specifics NFIR) , Article 107 ( False official statement , specifics NFIR), Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc . of controlled substance, cocaine, specifics NFIR) , a nd Article 133 (C onduct unbecoming an officer, specifics NFIR). The Applicant, after consult with qualified counsel, submitted a request to his commanding officer for a resignation in lieu of trial by court-martial ( R ILT). In the request, the Applicant, in exchange for pleading guilty to the offenses in which he was charged, offered to accept administrative separation with a characterization of service no less than Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, thereby avoiding a possible conviction and punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial. The Secretary of the Navy accepted the Applicant’s request , and he was a dministratively separated on 30 April 200 7 with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge .
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his misconduct was an isolated incident in 15 years of service with no disciplinary action. Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the N aval S ervice in order to maintain proper order and discipline; violations of UCMJ Articles 92, 107, 112a , and 133 meet this standard. Since an administrative discharge is not punishment, the decision to administratively discharge a service member is made independently of and does not require adjudication at court-martial or nonjudicial punishment. When the service of a member of the Naval Service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as H onorable . An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when the member’s conduct involves one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. The Applicant’s service contained a violation of UCMJ Article s 92, 107, 112a, and 13 3, which each constitute the commission of a serious offense and are punishable by up to five years confinement and a Bad Conduct or Dishonorable Discharge if adjudicated by trial at courts-martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Marines, especially a Major with 15 years of service, and falls short of what is required for an upgrade in the characterization of service. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant seeks an upgrade based on post-service achievements. The NDRB considers post-service conduct in order to determine if the misconduct committed during active duty was indicative of the Applicant ’ s character or an aberration. However, there is no law or regulation that provides an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a

more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided documentary evidence of his career pursuit and current employment in the teaching field and a commercial driver ’ s license certificate. Alt hough not submitted, the Applicant could have also provided: letters of personal references; verifiable employment record; letters of recommendation from his employer; evidence of a drug - free lifestyle; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability; college or vocational training transcripts; and documentation of community or church service. After careful consideration of all the available evidence to include the Applicant’s testimony, the Board determined that this issue d i d not provide a basis for which relief could be granted. Relief denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, documents and testimony given by the Applicant and the resignation in lieu of trial d ischarge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain RES IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500686

    Original file (MD1500686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 4: (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200775

    Original file (ND1200775.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was improper.2. The Applicant contends his discharge was improper.Per Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C, Administrative Separation of Officers, an officer may be processed for separation for the “commission of a military or civilian offense which could be punished by confinement of 6 months or more and any other misconduct which...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401187

    Original file (MD1401187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400713

    Original file (ND1400713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201541

    Original file (ND1201541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident in 124 months of service with no other adverse action. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401742

    Original file (ND1401742.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (OTHER). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200894

    Original file (ND1200894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Discharge:Authority for Discharge:SECNAVINST 1920.6C The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s record of service included significant misconduct that warranted his separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201130

    Original file (ND1201130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400722

    Original file (ND1400722.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board applauds the Applicant’s civilian service in support of the Global War on Terrorism and his productivity in the workforce; however the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant neither mitigates nor demonstratesthat his narrative reason for separation was inappropriate.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000213

    Original file (ND1000213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, UA from 0630 to 2025 on 20071002, surrendered on board USS Boone) and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance, substance and content...