Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100939

Original file (ND1100939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ATAN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110225

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20041013 - 20041207     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20041208     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20090916      Highest Rank/Rate: AT3
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 09 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 77
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.88 ( 8 )     Behavior: 2.63 ( 8 )       OTA: 2.88

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NDSM GWOTSM GCM

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : 1

- 20080828 :      Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, dereliction in the performance of duties)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPF Suspended: FOP

S CM : NONE SPCM: NONE C C : NONE Retention Warning Counseling : NONE

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 23, effective 19 May 2008 until 9 November 2009, Article 1910-156, SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his discharge is too harsh.

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0517 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the U niform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, dereliction in the performance of duties). His command administratively processed him for separation due to unsatisfactory performance. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . He was not eligible for an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is too harsh. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 23, effective 19 May 2008 until 9 November 2009, Article 1910-156, SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE states that “m embers may be separated when they are unqualified for further Naval Service as demonstrated by one or more enlisted performance evaluation with 1.0 marks for any performance trait ….” The Applicant received a 1.0 performance trait mark on an evaluation following an NJP for violation of UCMJ Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation). The Naval Military Personnel Manual further directs that characterization of service for administrative separations due to U nsatisfactory P erformance will be General (Under Honorable Conditions) unless Uncharacterized or Honorable is warranted. Since the Applicant had served more than 180 days when notified of separation, he was no longer in an entry level status and so an Uncharacterized i s not authorized. The Applicant’s record contained an NJP and showed his enlisted evaluation overall trait average was 2.88 over eight reporting periods , which is below average. The record contained no indication of meritorious service or other performance factors that would warrant an Honorable characterization of service. Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s characterization of service is appropriate as assigned. No change is warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000154

Original file (ND1000154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20071127 - 20080408Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080409Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090705Highest Rank/Rate:YNSNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 53EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.5(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 2.17Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300692

Original file (ND1300692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201826

Original file (ND1201826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20060426 - 20060906Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060907Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20091104Highest Rank/Rate: STS3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 28 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 70EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 3.00Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201393

Original file (ND1201393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100077

Original file (ND1100077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change in his RE code. Representation: none By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102173

Original file (ND1102173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Accordingly, the NDRB...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201730

Original file (ND1201730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was based on two incidents in 48 months of service with no other adverse actions. The NDRB determined the characterization of Under Honorable Conditions (General) was warranted, and the narrative reason for separation was proper. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101294

Original file (ND1101294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070619 - 20080902Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080903Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20091202Highest Rank/Rate: HALength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 00 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 36EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 1.50Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001987

Original file (ND1001987.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400662

Original file (ND1400662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20091209 - 20100920Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100921Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130315Highest Rank/Rate:QMSNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 25 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.3(3)Behavior:1.3(3)OTA: 1.56Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100939

Similar Decisions