Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201730
Original file (ND1201730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MM3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120813
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:       REDUCTION I N FORCE

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20060325 - 20061112     Active:            20061113 - 20090509 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20090510     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20110106      Highest Rank/Rate: MM2
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 28 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 96
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.3 ( 3 )      Behavior: 2.7 ( 3 )        OTA: 2.38

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol

Pe riods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20100531 :      Article (Absence without leave, failing to go to place of duty on or about 20100414)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :            SPCM:            C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20100531 :       For violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 - Failing to go or leaving place of duty on or about 20100414.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

          “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 061113 UNTIL 090509 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.









Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, effective 13 April 2010 until Present, Article 1910-156, SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends his discharge was based on two incidents in 48 months of service with no other adverse actions. He further contends that even after the incidents , he maintained high spirits and performed to the best of his abilities.
2 .       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade.
Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0521             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Absence without leave, failing to go to place of duty on or about 20100414). The record reflects the Applicant was processed for administrative separation by his command after a f orce conversion disapproval. W hen notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant elected to submit a written statement but waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and request a General Court-Mart ial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was based on two incidents in 48 months of service with no other adverse actions. He further contends that even after the incidents, he maintained high spirits and performed to the best of his abilities. The Applicant received an Honorable discharge for his first enlistment from November 2006 to May 2009. Each period of enlistment is an independent obligation and characterization is determined for that specific period of time. During his second enlistment, he had a forced conversion request disapproved and was processed for administrative separation. Pursuant to Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, effective 13 April 2010 until Present, Article 1910-156, SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE , t he characterization of service should be General (U nder H onorable C onditions ) , unless an Honorable is warranted. During the Applicant’s second enlistment, he was found guilty at NJP for violation of UCMJ Article 86 , and his overall trait average for his evaluations were below average at 2.38 . As to the narrative reason for separation, the Applicant had the opportunity to request voluntary early separation for reduction in force (RIF) in lieu of administrative separation. There is no indication in the Applicant’s record he met the requirements for RIF or that he applied for RIF. The Applicant submitted no evidence to support his contention, therefore, the NDRB relied upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of government affairs. T he NDRB determined the characterization of Under Honorable Conditions ( General ) was warranted, and the n arrative reason for s eparation was proper. Relief denied.

Issue 2: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade to Honorable. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement, college transcripts, and certification as a water treatment plant operator. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. T he Board determined the characterization of service received was proper and equitable. Relief denied.


Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100409

    Original file (ND1100409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000154

    Original file (ND1000154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20071127 - 20080408Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080409Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090705Highest Rank/Rate:YNSNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 53EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.5(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 2.17Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201334

    Original file (ND1201334.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:REQUESTED, BUT NOT SPECIFIED Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080318 - 20080625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080626Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20110826Highest Rank/Rate: ET3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 01 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 69EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(6)Behavior:3.0(6)OTA: 3.02Awards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201529

    Original file (ND1201529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500265

    Original file (ND1500265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant retired from service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201512

    Original file (ND1201512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:DISABILITY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR19960408 - 19960430Active:19960501 - 2002042820020429 - 20050526 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20091005Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100903Highest Rank/Rate: AT1Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 29 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 64EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.0(1)OTA:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100303

    Original file (MD1100303.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201393

    Original file (ND1201393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201826

    Original file (ND1201826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20060426 - 20060906Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060907Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20091104Highest Rank/Rate: STS3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 28 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 70EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 3.00Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101345

    Original file (ND1101345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...