Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100932

Original file (ND1100932.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110301

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       DEPEND E NCY, HARDSHIP, OR CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19970910 - 19970912     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19970913     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19981112      Highest Rank/Rate: AA
Length of Service: Y ear M onth 28 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 32
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : NONE S CM : NONE SPCM: NONE C C : NONE

Retention Warning Counseling : 1

- 19980717 :       For failure to adhere to proper military conduct .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB note d an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MILPERSMAN 1910-120 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec ember 19 97 until 21 Aug ust 20 01, Article 1910-112 (previously 3620220), Separation by Reason of Convenience of the Government - Pregnancy or Childbirth .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks a change in her RE code to re-enlist in the Armed Forces.
2.       The Applicant contends her separation was inequitable , because she did not receive an administrative board.
3.       The Applicant desires to change her narrative reason for separation to Hardship, Dependency , or Convenience of the Government.

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0517             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning . The Applicant was administratively processed for separation by her command due to pregnancy. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitled to an ad ministrative board .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in her RE code to re-enlist in the Armed Forces. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records (B CNR ) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. The NDRB notes that the BCNR provided a DD Form 215 for the Applicant on 9 March 2012 that changed her RE code from RE-4 to RE-3B.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her separation was inequitable , because she did not receive an opportunity for an administrative board. Per the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN), the Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board since she received an Honorable characterization of service and had less than six years of service. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant desires to change her narrative reason for separation to Hardship, Dependency or Convenience of the Government. None of these requested changes apply to the Applicant. A H ardship discharge must be specifically requested by a member and must be approved through the chain of command. There is no evidence in the record the Applicant ever formally sought a H ardship discharge through her command. The Applicant was discharged due to the convenience of the government for pregnancy or childbirth and was properly assigned the narrative reason for separation of PREGNANCY OR CHILDBIRTH per MILPERSMAN (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec ember 19 97 until 21 Aug ust 20 01, Article 1910-112 (previously 3620220), Separation by Reason of Convenience of the Government - Pregnancy or Childbirth . Based on available records, the narrative reason for separation is correct as assigned. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001983

Original file (ND1001983.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enlist in the Reserves.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500911

Original file (ND0500911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed “From Convenience of the Government to Hardship.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00947

Original file (ND01-00947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND01-00947 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010717, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, she was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "In September 1999, AA (Applicant) requested separation from the navy due to parenthood;...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01416

Original file (ND03-01416.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. [SERVICE RECORD DOES NOT CONTAIN APPLICANT’S REQUEST FOR DISCHARGE DUE TO PREGNANCY.] As the discharge decision is presumed, under law, to be correct, the Naval Discharge Review Board may affirm the original decision even if official records which it would normally be required to review as part of the discharge review process cannot be located.
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201259

Original file (ND1201259.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:CONDITION INTERFERES WITH DUTY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020423 - 20021209Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20021210Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040525Highest Rank/Rate: SNLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 2.50Awards and...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00590

Original file (ND03-00590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AA, USNDocket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. [Signed by the Applicant]” ________________________________________________________________________ Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider.
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500891

Original file (ND0500891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Based upon the Applicant’s misconduct, there was nothing improper in the award of a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400720

Original file (ND1400720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests a change to her DD214’s Narrative Reason for Separation to receive benefits. The Applicant requests a change to her DD214’s Narrative Reason for Separation to receive benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800847

Original file (ND0800847.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, after a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate in light of the nature of the Applicant’s misconduct, and that the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient to convince the Board that an upgrade was appropriate at this time.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00402

Original file (ND99-00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND99-00402 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Character Reference letter of Jan 15, 1999 (family member) Character Reference letter of Jan 15, 1999 (family member) 2 Statements by the Applicant to the Board dated...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100932

Similar Decisions