Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001983

Original file (ND1001983.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EMFA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100805

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: PREGNANCY OR CHILDBIRTH
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19980529 - 19981123     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19981124     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20020814      Highest Rank/Rate: EM3
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 21 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 42
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.38

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      AFEM SSDR (2) NDSM GCM

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : 2

- 20020211:      Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications )
         Article 125 (Sodomy)
         Article 134 (Conduct prejudice to good order and discipline, 2 specifications )
         Awarded: RIR FOP EPD Suspended: NONE

- 20020324 :      Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, dereliction of duty on 20020301)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPD Suspended:

S CM : NONE       SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling : 2

- NFIR : For fraudulent induction as evidenced by failure to disclose required basic enlistment eligibility information.

- 20020211 :       For dereliction of duty and sodomy .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative errors on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MILPERS MAN 1910- 112 ”
         “ PREGNANCY OR CHILDBIRTH ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 33, effective 22 Aug ust 20 01 until 21 Aug ust 20 02, Article 1910-112 (previously 3620220), SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT – PREGNANCY .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enlist in the R eserve s .
2.       The Applicant contends she was discharged by her command , because she was in danger from her estranged husband and is deserving of an H onorable discharge.

Decision

Date : 20 1 1 1109             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : none

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included two NAVP ERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and two nonjudicial punishments (NJPs) for violations o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Fail ure to obey order or regulation , 3 specifications ), Article 125 (Sodomy) , and Article 134 (Conduct prejudi ce to good order and discipline , 2 specifications ). The Applicant was separated due to pregnancy. Based on her previous misconduct , her command determined a G eneral ( U nder H onorable C onditions) characterization of service was warranted. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enlist in the R eserve s . Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she was discharged by her command , because she was in danger from her estranged husband and is deserving of an H onorable discharge. The Applicant submitted documentation in support of her issue , including statements from the assistant district attorney who prosecuted her husband and the director of social work at N aval Medical Center San Diego. Both statements outline the serious threat posed by her husband, and the need for her to be discharged so she could move out of state to live with family. While the NDRB fully appreciates the serious nature of the Applicant’s situation that led to her separation, she had engaged in numerous acts of serious misconduct that each could have resulted in confinement and a Bad Conduct Discharge if adjudicated at special court-martial. The multiple misconduct occurred months before the event described in her documentation that led to her discharge for her safety. The Applicant’s misconduct of record warrants a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service. An u pgrade would be inappropriate.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100932

Original file (ND1100932.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change in her RE code to re-enlist in the Armed Forces.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800847

Original file (ND0800847.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, after a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate in light of the nature of the Applicant’s misconduct, and that the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient to convince the Board that an upgrade was appropriate at this time.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00947

Original file (ND01-00947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND01-00947 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010717, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, she was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "In September 1999, AA (Applicant) requested separation from the navy due to parenthood;...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500839

Original file (ND0500839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Further, the Applicant implies through supporting documents, that due to her pregnancy and financial situation, her discharge should have been by reason of hardship. Pregnancy/Childbirth is the reason the Applicant was discharged. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization or narrative reason changes solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400573

Original file (ND1400573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s voluntary request to be discharged from the Navy, command administratively processed for separation. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201259

Original file (ND1201259.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:CONDITION INTERFERES WITH DUTY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020423 - 20021209Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20021210Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040525Highest Rank/Rate: SNLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 2.50Awards and...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600021

Original file (MD0600021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Discharge received at the time of discharge be changed to “Hardship.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not provide any information to the Board to demonstrate that she properly requested discharge on the basis of hardship or that she met the criteria for discharge by reason of hardship. The Applicant’s records clearly document that the Applicant requested separation after becoming pregnant and...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00085

Original file (ND03-00085.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, she was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. During the process of my discharge from the Navy, I was told that my discharge was going to be Convenience of the Government due to Pregnancy/or Childbirth. A review of the Applicant’s service record shows she did not meet the requirements to be discharged for misconduct due to commission of a serious...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400720

Original file (ND1400720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests a change to her DD214’s Narrative Reason for Separation to receive benefits. The Applicant requests a change to her DD214’s Narrative Reason for Separation to receive benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301092

Original file (ND1301092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030513 - 20040127Active:Pre-Service Drug Waiver: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040128Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070918Highest Rank/Rate: AZ3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)22 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 64EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(4)Behavior:3.51(4)OTA: 3.91Awards and...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001983

Similar Decisions