Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101864
Original file (MD1101864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110802
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20100113 - 20100 9 06     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20100907     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20100922      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 16 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 64
MOS: NONE
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): NONE         Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: NONE SCM: NONE SPCM: NONE CC: NONE Retention Warning Counseling : NONE

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends his recruiter advised him to not disclose his medical history of a pilonidal cyst .
2.       The Applicant contends his narrative reason for separation is inaccurate.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 090 6            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no 6105 counseling warnings and no misconduct resulting in non-judicial punishment or court-martial. The Applicant was administratively processed for separation by his command for Fraudulent Entry after revealing while at Marine Corps Recruit Depot (MCRD) that he had a pilonidal cyst. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his recruiter advised him to not disclose his medical history of a pilonidal cyst during the enlistment process. The Applicant also contends his narrative reason for separation is inaccurate. On 7 September 2010 during the “Moment of Truth” at MCRD , the Applicant made a voluntary statement that he had a recurrence of a pilonidal cyst two days prior to reporting to MCRD . The Applicant also stated that he had a pilonidal cystectomy 3 years ago. A thorough review of his medical history form reflects that the Applicant revealed several medical issues that he received waivers for. T he Board concluded that considering the fact that the Applicant truthfully revealed several other possibl y disqualifying medical conditions during the enlistment process , he likely did not deliberately withh o ld a prior history of a pilonidal cyst on his own accord and did not intentionally commit fraud . The Board concluded that the discharge was proper at the time of discharge, but the narrative reason was not equitable. The Applicant should have been discharged for Erroneous Entry, whereby a member may be separated on the basis of erroneous enlistment, reenlistment, induction, or extension of enlistment when the enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by the Marine Corps or had appropriate directives been followed. However, that narrative reason cannot be assigned, because he was not notified of this reason for separation processing. Therefore, t he NDRB voted unanimously to change the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority .

An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when separation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable characterization. Since the Applicant served only 16 days, an Uncharacterized discharge is the most appropriate characterization of service.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper but not equitable. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall change to . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101750

    Original file (MD1101750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20100220 - 20100425Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100426Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100603Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)09 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:53MOS: 8011Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NA/NAFitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300646

    Original file (MD1300646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was warranted and equitable, but found the narrative reason to be improper.Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall change to.The Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601162

    Original file (MD0601162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NONE Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040128: Applicant’s statement. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20030613: MEPS Report of Medical History signed by the Applicant declaring no recurrent back pain or any back problem. SEPARATION (20040128) SJA review (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDSeparation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT, SAN...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02797

    Original file (BC-2003-02797.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-02797 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reason for his 2003 entry-level separation (ELS) be changed and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from “4C” to “2Q” or “3K.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601000

    Original file (MD0601000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20010423Narrative Reason(s): ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCTLeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20010423Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): ENTRY LEVEL(20010419)SJA review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700234

    Original file (MD0700234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20051123 - 20051204Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20051205Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060111 Length of Service: 00 Yrs 01Mths07 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500574

    Original file (ND1500574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201179

    Original file (MD1201179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:Fraudulent Enlistment and Major Depression Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20090903 - 20091213Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20091214Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20091222Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)09 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:62MOS: NFIRProficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NA/NAFitness...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01934

    Original file (PD-2013-01934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “recurring pilonidal cyst”as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The rating for the unfitting recurring pilonidal cyst condition is addressed below including possible residuals; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Additionally, he also had difficulties with his...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601222

    Original file (MD0601222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 3: (Equity) The Board determined the Applicant was involuntarily discharged based on a medical prognosis that the Applicant’s condition would unlikely change if retained. SEPARATION (20050701) SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT, SAN DIEGO CA 92140-5000 (20050707)Narrative Reason directed: DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT DUE TO FRAUDULENT ENTRYCharacterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20050711 Additional Documents Considered...