Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101548

Original file (MD1101548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110607

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19970919 - 19971111     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19971112     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19990715      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 04 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 42
MOS: 6672
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle CoA

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    C C:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19990312 :       For your diagnosed personality disorder. This disorder may impair your inability to function effectively in military service. In accordance with MARCORSEPMAN 6105, a further trial of service is required.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual,
(MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obtain veteran benefits.
2.       Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to i mprove employment opportunities.
3.       Applicant contends mitigating circumstances prior to her separation warrant consideration for a discharge upgrade.
4.       NDRB Issue: The Applicant served h onorabl y .

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 0 9 14          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Although the Applicant’s service records are incomplete (illegible or partially illegible administrative separation documentation to include: mental health evaluat ion findings and recommendation and the Separation Authority decision letter), the Board completed a thorough review of the available documentation to determine whether her discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 retention counseling warning (for personality disorder) but no evidence of commanding officer nonjudicial punishment (NJP) or trial by courts-martial. On or about 11 June 1999, the Applicant’s command received a recommendation from Naval Mental Health recommending expeditious administrative separation of the Applicant. Unfortunately, due to the degraded condition of the microfiche, the specific details provided within the recommendation could not be retrieved. Based on the medical authority findings and recommendation, and the Applicant’s performance record and potential for further service, her command processed her for administrative separation from the Marine Corps. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure on 29 June 1999 , the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement in rebuttal to the proposed separation. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative separation board . The Applicant was separated from the Marine Corps on 15 July 1999 due to Personality Disorder.

Issues 1-2 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obtain veteran benefits and to improve employment opportunities. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends mitigating circumstances prior to her separation warrant consideration for a discharge upgrade. In her letter to the NDRB, the Applicant referenced a personal trauma she experienced as a result of action(s) from a fellow member of her command. She states this trauma and having to remain within the same command with the individual involved led to her eventual discharge from the Marine Corps . T he Board conducted a detailed review of the Applicant’s records to determine whether her discharge met the pertinent standards for propriety and equity. After detailed analysis and careful consideration of all the available documentation, the Board could find no evidence within the record nor did the Applicant submit any evidence to support her contention. Accordingly, the NDRB determined this issue did not provide a basis for which relief could be granted. Relief denied.

Issue 4 : ( Board Issue ) ( ) RELIEF WARRANTED. During the review of the Applicant’s discharge, the NDRB determined that although the Applicant’s separation from the Marine Corps on the basis of P ersonality D isorder was proper, the characterization of service awarded was inequitable. The Applicant’s service records contained no evidence of misconduct (i.e. , 6105 retention warning, NJP, trial by courts-martial, or civil arrest/conviction ) or other significant negative aspects that would warrant a General discharge. Additionally, her Proficiency/Conduct mark average was 4.5/4.5 over five reporting periods, to include her final evaluation marks of 4.6/4.6 just prior to discharge. T he NDRB , after careful consideration, found the characterization of service to be inequitable. Accordingly, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s characterization of service shall change to Honorable. Relief granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100363

Original file (MD1100363.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001154

Original file (MD1001154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, throughout the periods of treatment by both medical and mental health care providers, the Applicant displayed no misconduct and received proficiency and conduct markings of 4.6/4.6 and 4.5/4.6.The NDRB reviewed all of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and elements of the discharge, evidence submitted by the Applicant, and the circumstances unique to this case. Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500879

Original file (MD1500879.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Therefore, the awarded...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902030

Original file (MD0902030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000915

Original file (MD1000915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the Applicant was convicted in civilian court in 2008, the offense happened 18 years prior and before she enlisted in the Marine Corps. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall change to . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801075

Original file (MD0801075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301309

Original file (MD1301309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900774

Original file (MD0900774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requested the NDRB to consider her post-service conduct in support of her request for an upgrade in her characterization to Uncharacterized.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. The Board determined the characterization of service received, Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service, the UCMJ violations involved, and the limited post-service...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700904

Original file (MD0700904.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although not an excuse for misconduct, the NDRB noted that there was an inequity in the Applicant’s discharge action in that the punishment was too severe for the misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101678

Original file (MD1101678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20080617 - 20090621Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080617Age at Enlistment: 17Period of Enlistment:8 Years Months (Reserve ROEP 6x2)Date of Discharge:20101030Highest Rank:LCplLength of Service: Inactive: 01 Year 00Month(s) 04 Day(s) Active: 01 Year 04 Month(s) 08 Day(s)Education Level: 12AFQT:78MOS: 3531 (Motor Transport...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101548

Similar Decisions