Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001154
Original file (MD1001154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100409
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050713 - 20060618     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060619     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20080822      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 0 4 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 60
MOS: 3043 (Supply Administration and Operations Specialist)
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle , ,

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    C C:

Retention Warning Counseling : 1

- 20080815 :       For failing the July-December semi-annual period Physical Fitness Test. Assigned to company remedial PT program and Semper-Fit back on track program. Advised that failure to take corrective action may result in administrative separation or limitation of further service.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6203.3 CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 D ecisional issues : The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of her service at discharge from General (Under Honorable Conditions) to Honorable, contending that her personality disorder was related to post - partum depression and emotional stressors d uring an isolated period, further compounded by her diagnosis of h ypothyroidism, and was not reflective of her stellar conduct and performance of duties.

Decision

 Date: 20 1 1 04 29            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one issue for consideration by the NDRB; additionally , the NDRB completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge, and the discharge process, to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of both equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service documents stellar performance and conduct with average proficiency and conduct markings of 4.7/4.7 over two years and two months of service. The Applicant ’ s record of service contains no non-judicial or judicial punishments and one 6105 retention -warning counseling re garding her failure of the second period , semi-annual physical fitness test in August 2008.

The Applicant’s record of service and medical records document that appropriately credentialed mental health care providers and medical health care providers diagnosed and treated the Applicant. The Applicant’s medical records indicate that she was diagnosed with a Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment Disorder with anxiety and depression, and Borderline Personality Disorder. Additionally, the Applicant was being treated for p ost- p artum d epression and h ypothyroidism while also receiving marital counseling. She was receiving continued counseling and medication regimens for treatment. The Applicant ’ s medical record further documents that her h ypothyroidism could be contributing to the depression. The mental health care provider recommended expeditious separation due to a pre-existing medical condition aggravated by active duty service.

On 16 May 2008, the Applicant was recommend for a dministrative separation from the Naval Service by her command pursuant to the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN) , paragraph 6203.3 (Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder) and paragraph 6204.3a (Fraudulent Entry into the Marine Corps). The specific basis for the recommendation was the mental health care provider ’ s diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder - a condition that she was aware of prior to enlistment and which she did not disclose. The Applicant was further recommended for expeditious processing , which waived the requirement for retention warning counseling. The Command recommended she receive a characterization of her service at discharge of General (Under Honorable Conditions). The Applicant waived her right to consult with qualified legal counsel and to submit written matters to the Separation Authority; she did not warrant an administrative discharge hearing board due to the characterization of service proposed. The discharge recommendation was endorsed by her chain of command and on 08 Aug 2008, it was approved. The Separation Authority designated the primary basis for separation as Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder pursuant to paragraph 6203.3 of the MARCORSEPMAN.

Decisional Issue: ( ) - RELIEF WARRANTED. The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of her service at discharge from General (Under Honorable Conditions) to Honorable, contending that her personality disorder was related to post - partum depression and emotional stressors during an isolated period, further compounded by her diagnosis of h ypothyroidism, and was not reflective of her stellar conduct and performance of duties.



(Propriety) Pursuant to paragraph 6203.3 of the M ARCORSEPMAN , members may be processed for separation based on a Mental Health Care Professional ’ s clinical diagnosis of a personality disorder when that disorder is so severe that one ’ s ability to function effectively and perform their duties is significantly impaired, and the individual poses a threat to the safety or well being of themselves or others. The record of evidence reflects the Applicant met the basic requirement for administrative separation by reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder. However, the Applicant ’ s medical record also documents a diagnosis and treatment of h ypothyroidism, which the medical doctors identified as possibly contributing to the Applicant ’ s d epression, coupled with p ost -p artum d epression and marital infidelity by the Applicant’s spouse. Additionally, throughout the periods of treatment by both medical and mental health care providers, the Applicant displayed no misconduct and received proficiency and conduct markings of 4.6/4.6 and 4.5/4.6. The NDRB reviewed all of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and elements of the discharge, evidence submitted by the Applicant, and the circumstances unique to this case . By a vote of 5-0, the NDRB determined impropriety in the discharge action and determined that relief was warranted. The NDRB determined that the narrative reason for discharge - Personality Disorder - was not warranted; as such, the Narrative Reason for Separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.

(Equity) Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval Service. An Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service meets the standard of acceptable conduct and performance for naval personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization of service would be clearly inappropriate. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service is appropriate if the member’s service has been honest and faithful, but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of his record. A particular circumstance of interest in the Applicant’s characterization of service was the lack of any negative information in the 2 6 months of service that would otherwise prevent characterization of her service as H onorable. A review of the Applicant’s official service record reveals only one retention warning for failure of the semi-annual physical fitness test; given the medical diagnosis of h ypothyroidism and post - partum depression along with the medication treatment regimen prescribed, the NDRB determined this counseling was not indicative of her overall characterization of service. Furthermore, the Applicant’s service record reflects overall proficiency and conduct markings of 4.7/4.7, which are characteristic of excellent to outstanding performance of duties and conduct in service. The NDRB concluded that there was an inequity in the Applicant’s discharge action, is convinced that this was prejudicial to the Applicant, and therefore an inequity in the characterization did occur. A preponderance of the evidence reviewed supports the conclusion that the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful; as such, t he NDRB determined an upgrade to an Honorable characterization of service appropriate. Relief as requested is warranted.

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries , additional supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant, and the discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400067

    Original file (MD1400067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After 13 months of strenuous efforts to motivate the Applicant, her command notified her on 7 November 2001 of administrative separation processing for Personality Disorder with a recommended characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500307

    Original file (ND1500307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion As a result of the Applicant’s claim of PTSD due to military sexual trauma and in-service diagnosis of a personality disorder, in accordance with U.S. Code, Title X, Section 1553 (d)(1), the Naval Discharge Review Board included a member who is a physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist. ” Additional Reviews : After...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901529

    Original file (MD0901529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03457

    Original file (BC-1997-03457.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant acknowledged receipt of the Letter of Notification on 19 September 1994 and on 20 September 1994 stated that she had been notified of the recommendation for discharge action for a Personality Disorder and of the specific basis of the proposed discharge. Applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force on 17 October 1994 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Personality Disorder) with an honorable discharge. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9703457

    Original file (9703457.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant acknowledged receipt of the Letter of Notification on 19 September 1994 and on 20 September 1994 stated that she had been notified of the recommendation for discharge action for a Personality Disorder and of the specific basis of the proposed discharge. Applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force on 17 October 1994 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Personality Disorder) with an honorable discharge. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300913

    Original file (MD1300913.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MID 13-00913 - DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY _ NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) “DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT APPLICANT’S ISSUES 1. Employment/Educational Opportunities: The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities, Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00260

    Original file (MD04-00260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a discharge upgrade of his current General, Under Honorable Conditions to an Honorable discharge. Additionally, the FSM requests the Narrative Reason be changed to reflect a Medical Discharge.The FSM served on active...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902377

    Original file (MD0902377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on several mental health evaluations, the Applicant’s command administratively processed her for separation. The NDRB voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of the discharge to Honorable.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PERSONALITY...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000079

    Original file (MD1000079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per the recommendation of the Mental Health department, SNM should not deploy at this time. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01432

    Original file (MD03-01432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In closing, I respectfully request that block 28-narrative reason for separation on my DD 214 member 4 form be amended to a statement that was both factually paramount to my discharge and presently beneficial for securing employment. (f) (1).As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to...