Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902449
Original file (ND0902449.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ICFR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090902
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630600 [commission of a serious offense]

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19891128 - 19900823     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19900824     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19941216      Highest Rank/Rate: IC3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 23 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 32
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.7 ( 3 )      Behavior: 3.8 ( 3 )        OTA: 3.80

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

NJP :

- 19940429 :      Article (UA 19940307-19940314 , 7 days )
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :

- 19910826 :       Art icle (UA 19910704-19910815, 42 days)
          Article 87 (Missing ship’s movement)
         Sentence :

- 19940923 :       Art icle (UA 19940718-19940829, 42 days)
         Article 87 (Missing movement), 2 specifications
         Specification 1: 19940808 , through neglect
         Specification 2: 19940718 , through design
         Sentence : ( 19940923-NFIR ) BW for 3 days

SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 199 1 0828 :       For your failure to disclose your preservice civilian involvement/drug abuse. Dec 1986 - shoplifting - no charges filed

- 19930504 :       For unauthorized absence for 7 days.



Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ 94SEP23-94OCT16; 94JUL18-94AUG28; 94MAR07-94MAR13; 91JUL04-91AUG14 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 2 October 1996,
Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION
OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 86 and 87 .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1. Was held beyond his end of active obligated service (EAOS).
2. Had family problems with his wife.
3 . Post-service conduct warrants consideration.
Decision
Date: 20 10 1001             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included two NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings ; one nonjudicial punishment for violation o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 7 days, surrendered); and two summary court-martials for violations of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 2 specifications: 42 days surrendered, 42 days surrendered/apprehended not found in record) and Article 87 (Missing movement through neglect or design , 3 specifications). Based on the offenses , his command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the administrative board procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

 Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was held beyond his EAOS. The NDRB noted on his Form DD 214, block 18, Remarks, that the Applicant was held beyond his normal EAOS to complete separation physical. The Applicant had three Article 86 violations (7 days, 42 days, 42 days) and sentenced t o 24 days of confinement . Per the Navy Military Personnel Manual, f or each period of time lost, the normal expiration of enlisted dates must be extended by the number of days lost on a day-for-day basis. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s EAOS was extended for each period of time lost and therefore, was not held beyond his EAOS. Relief denied.

Issue 2: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he had family problems with his wife and chose to be with her to work through their problems. The Applicant provided no documented evidence he informed his chain of command of family problems and did not receive the assistance, leave, or help he asked for. Additionally, the Applicant made no mention of, nor provided documented proof, if he attempted to use any one of the numerous family support programs sponsored by or for military service members. These programs and services, such as Family Advocacy, Navy – Marine Corps Relief Society, Red Cross, the Chaplain, or Navy medical health personnel, all provide services to members of the military in times of need. Without documentary evidence, t he NDRB could not form a basis of relief. Relief denied.

Issue 3: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he has been a good citizen since being discharged, works forty hours per week, has two daughters, is a member of a church, and provided three (unsigned) letters of reference. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, he failed to provide any post-service documentary evidence to form a basis of relief. T he Applicant c ould have provided documentation that could include but is not limited to: letters of personal reference , verifiable employment record s , letters of recommendation from employers , certification of non-involvement with civil authorities , evidence of financial stability (mortgage or home rental history, credit score, credit card payments) , documentation of community or church service , an d a marriage certificate. The Applicant should be aware submission of these items does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the NDRB on a case-by-case basis.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant is not eligible for a personal appearance hearing since fifteen years has elapsed from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraph titled Additional Reviews .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900977

    Original file (ND0900977.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801214

    Original file (ND0801214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Applicants argument that he was wrongfully discharged nine days prior to his EAOS is also without merit since MILPERSMAN 1910 – 152 allows for separation of a member any time during their career if there is a determination of alcohol treatment failure.Based on a review of the evidence the Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700818

    Original file (MD0700818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Court-Martial proceedings, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offensesthat he committed. 97-1606Applicant Discharged: 19971023 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902521

    Original file (ND0902521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000536

    Original file (ND1000536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Full relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall change to . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002191

    Original file (ND1002191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obtain G.I. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.While reviewing the Applicant’s service record, the NDRB noted that the Applicant’s EAOS was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801400

    Original file (ND0801400.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a personal statement and as evidence of post-service accomplishments. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201335

    Original file (ND1201335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:EXPIRATION OF ACTIVE OBLIGATED SERVICE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030228 - 20030715Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030716Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070629Highest Rank/Rate: AM3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 14 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 80EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.8(5)Behavior:2.8(5)OTA:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900625

    Original file (ND0900625.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory separation regardless of time in service, grade or record of service. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700885

    Original file (MD0700885.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19920813 - 19920922 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19920923Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:19940923Length of Service: 02 Yrs 00 Mths 00 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...