Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001840
Original file (ND1001840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100720
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20051128 - 20060612     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060613     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060829      Highest Rank/Rate: AR
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 17 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NONE         Behavior: NONE   OTA: NONE

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

P eriods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : NONE        S CM : NONE       SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling : NONE

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11 effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends his discharge was improper , because he was discharged for cognitive disorder , which should have resulted in a favorable reentry (RE) code that would have allowed him to continue his military service later.
2.       The Applicant contends there is no evidence to support his discharge for having cognitive disorder. He further contends the only record of him having cognitive disorder is during his military service .

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 1101             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the Applicant’s discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. His record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, non-judicial punishments, or trials by court-martial for violation s of the UCMJ. The Applicant was administratively processed for separation because he did not meet minimum physical /procurement standards for enlistment due to a cognitive disorder discovered during r ecruit t raining medical in - processing. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel , submit a written statement , and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority Review.

: (Non - decisional) The Applicant contends his discharge was improper , because he was discharged for cognitive disorder, which should have resulted in a favorable reentry code that would have allowed him to continue his military service at a later date . The NDRB is not authorized to change RE codes and has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces . Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to RE codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable RE code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends there is no evidence to support his discharge for having cognitive disorder. He further contends the only record of him having cognitive disorder is during his military service. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his claim. E vidence found in the Applicant’s service record indicate s competent medical authority diagnosed him with cognitive disorder on 5 July 2006 . There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support his contention that he d id not have cognitive disorder prior to, during, or after his military service. His statement alone does not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. The NDRB concluded that the Applicant’s discharge was proper. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300019

    Original file (ND1300019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:NO COGNITIVE DISORDER Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20031105 - 20040405Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040406Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040603Highest Rank/Rate:SALength of Service:YearMonth28 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 31EvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA: N/AAwards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100765

    Original file (ND1100765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030125 - 20030804Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030805Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20030917Highest Rank/Rate: FNLength of Service: Years Month13 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 56EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEBehavior:NONEOTA: NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200587

    Original file (ND1200587.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 3: (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. ” The NDRB determined the post-service evaluation does not refute the in-service diagnosis of Schizotypal Personality Disorder and further determined the narrative reason for separation was warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500173

    Original file (ND1500173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500585

    Original file (ND1500585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After an exhaustive review, the NDRB determined that his mental health issues did not mitigate the Applicant’s alcohol rehabilitation failure. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE. ”...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001065

    Original file (MD1001065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB concluded that there was an inequity in the Applicant’s discharge action, was convinced that it was prejudicial to the Applicant, and therefore determined an inequity in the characterization of his service had occurred.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Records, Discharge Process, and the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the NDRB determined that the discharge was proper, but not equitable, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500561

    Original file (ND1500561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) determined relief is warranted based on equitable grounds based on Issue # 10 due to the Applicant’s service connected cognitive defects. Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00460

    Original file (ND04-00460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The documentation and statements provided by the Applicant do not refute the evidence of record in which the Applicant was diagnosed to possess a cognitive disorder that disqualified him for further military service. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than one month in the military to warrant a change of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100227

    Original file (ND1100227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100823

    Original file (ND1100823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The NDRB determined that changing the characterization of service would be against regulations. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.