Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001029

Original file (ND1001029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-CE3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100316

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19850703 - 19850714     Active: 19850715 - 19910621
         USNR     19910622 - 199307 02
         USNR     19930703 - 199701 30

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19970131     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : 2 Years 48 MONTHS Extension (2x24-Mth Ext)
Date of Discharge: 20030115      Highest Rank/Rate: CE3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 16 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 32 / 47
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.1 ( 8 )      Behavior: 2.9 ( 8 )        OTA: 3.02

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (3)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :              S CM :             SPCM:             C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20020302 :      For unauthorized absence on 13 February 2002 from 1230 to 1730.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 4 August 2005, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-158, SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his discharge was unwarranted , because he did not have any misconduct . He further contends that because he served more than four years in the regular Navy , he was not obligated to serve in the Navy Reserve for any specific number of years and, therefore, was not forced out .

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 0616 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service include d one NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning . It did not include any non-judicial punishments or trials by court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. A ccording to documentation found in the Applicant’s service record, he was counseled for being absent without authorization from his Navy Reserve drills . Corrective actions were assigned , but he did not attempt to complete them and refused to complete his Annual Training for Fiscal Year 2002. Base d on the Applicant’s unsatisfactory participation , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant failed to return the notification procedure letter acknowledging whether he waived or elected his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was unwarranted , because he did not have any misconduct . He further contends that , because he served more than four years in the regular Navy , he was not obligated to serve in the Navy Reserve for any specific number of years and, therefore, was not forced out . The Applicant’s Record of Discharge from the U.S. Nav y Reserve (NAVPERS 1070/615) indicates he received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, not an Under Other Than Honorable Condition s discharge . In addition, a ccording to documentation found in the Applicant’s service record, on 3 February 2001 h e signed a n agreement to extend his enlistment for two years, in which he agreed to remain a member of the Ready Reserve for the period of the extension unless relieved earlier by proper authority . The Board determined that he had an obligation to continue serving until February 2003. The Board concluded that the Applicant was not approved for early relief from his extension agreement and that his decision s to absent himself from the command without authority and not complete his annual training met the requirement to be separated for unsatisfactory participation in the R eady R eserve. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100611

Original file (ND1100611.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enlist in the Armed Forces.2. Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301686

Original file (ND1301686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501171

Original file (ND1501171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. However, based on new DoD policy, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201334

Original file (ND1201334.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:REQUESTED, BUT NOT SPECIFIED Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080318 - 20080625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080626Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20110826Highest Rank/Rate: ET3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 01 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 69EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(6)Behavior:3.0(6)OTA: 3.02Awards and...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201909

Original file (MD1201909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no indication in the record that the Applicant was processed for or should have received a medical discharge for any period of active service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901635

Original file (ND0901635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. As stated above, the characterization differed from what the Applicant believed it to be and the Board determined no change is warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATIONS)...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902282

Original file (ND0902282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and one civilian conviction forlarceny of goods over $100.00.The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement and request a General Court-Martial Convening...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100110

Original file (MD1100110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400194

Original file (ND1400194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20071008 - 20071217Active:20000224 - 2003022120030124 - 2004030120050722 - 20060423 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20071218Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090119Highest Rank/Rate: CE3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 02 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT:...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000018

Original file (ND1000018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant contends he should have received a hardship discharge. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HARDSHIP.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001029

Similar Decisions