Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000704
Original file (ND1000704.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-STGSA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100112
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20040618 - 20041210     Active:  
                  20050110 - 20050124

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20050125     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060331      Highest Rank/Rate: STGS N
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 07 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 71
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: ( 1.0 )         OTA: 1.67
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :
- 20051216 :      Article , Unauthorized Absence from USS S TOUT DDG 55 from 0500-1400 on 1 December 2005.
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20060127 :      Article , Unauthorized Absences from USS S TOUT from 45 minutes to 1 hour each day by not reporting to designated work - center on or about 20060110, 20060121, 20060122, 20060123, 20060124.
         Article , Failure to obey order or regulation by wrongfully leaving the galley after being ordered to remain there and continue working.
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:
- 20051216 :      For non-judicial punishment of 16 December 2005 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until 19 May 2008, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Discharge is negatively affecting employment opportunities.
2.       M isconduct was due to youth and immaturity ; has since had time to grow and mature .
 3 .       Discharge on the basis of drug abuse was unjust because the result s from the urinal y sis were invalid.
4 .       P ost-service conduct warrants consideration.
Decision

Date: 20 1 1 0310             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and non-judicial punishments (NJP) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized Absence, two specifications) and Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, one specification). It did not include any summary or special courts-martial. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant elected rights to consu lt with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . He waived his right to request General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Non-decisional) The Applicant contends his discharge is negatively affecting employment opportunities. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing career opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant attributes his misconduct to being “young and immature . ” He states that he has since had time to “mature and grow , ” and now realize s he was irresponsible. While the Applicant may feel that youth and immaturity was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his misconduct was willful and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his d ischarge on the basis of drug abuse was unjust because the results of the urinalysis were invalid. Although Commanding Officer, USS STOUT , determine d the positive urinalysis was invalid and c ould n ot be considered, Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet deter mined the urinalysis could be used as a basis for the characterization of service if no other basis existed. Therefore, w hile being processed for administrative separation, the Applicant was notified of all potential reasons for separation , specifically, p attern of m isconduct and d rug a buse. Because p attern of m isconduct was another basis for separation that existed besides drug abuse, h is command separate d him for p attern of m isconduct due to the two NJPs he received for violations of Articles 86 and 92 of the UCMJ , not drug abuse . H is official reason for separation , as reflected on his DD-214 , is p attern of m isconduct. The Board discerned no impropriety in the discharge process. Relief denied.
Issue 4: (Decisional) ( ) . The A pplicant provided certification of a criminal history record and three letters of reference. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to exist during the period of enlistment in question. Unfortunately, the documentation the Applicant submitted along with the DD Form 293 does not contain sufficient information to evaluate his

post-service character and conduct. F or example, the Applicant could have also produced evidence of the following: a verifiable continuous employment record; documentation of community or church service; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; evidence of a drug-free lifestyle; and official transcripts reflecting attendance at or completion of higher education. C ompletion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character. Relief denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001718

    Original file (MD1001718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Though the Applicant was also notified of administrative separation for Personality Disorder, the separating authority (Commanding General, 2 nd Marine Division) properly directed that the Applicant be separated for a Pattern of Misconduct.Additionally, though the Applicant stated that he...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200679

    Original file (ND1200679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101555

    Original file (ND1101555.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful consideration, the NDRB determined that the Applicant was aware of his rights and that he had ample opportunity to defend himself by presenting an adequate defense at NJP or demanding trial by court-martial.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200870

    Original file (ND1200870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002108

    Original file (MD1002108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant agreed to plead guilty, to waive his right to an administrative board hearing, and to cooperate with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service; in consideration, the command agreed to withdraw the charges from a punitive court-martial venue and refer to the lesser administrative, non-punitive summary court-martial.On 02 June 2009, the Separation Authority approved the command’s recommendation for separation and directed the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401069

    Original file (ND1401069.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Although the Applicant stated that she went to NJP on her DD FORM 293 in 2010 for violation of Article 92, during her personal hearing, she submitted documentary evidence showing that she requested a trial by court-martial for the Article 92 violation that coincided with being the same day that she was notified for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201177

    Original file (MD1201177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    And did so knowing that marijuana is not tolerated in the United States Marine Corps.” On 2 March 2005, after considering the facts and circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative discharge, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be separated from the Marine Corps with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct- Drug Abuse (primary basis) and Pattern of Misconduct. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902576

    Original file (MD0902576.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300479

    Original file (ND1300479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for education benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201719

    Original file (ND1201719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...