Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300479

Original file (ND1300479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20121231

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020528 - 20021007     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20021008     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050323      Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 16 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20030422 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20031105 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Article (General A rticle , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Contributing to the delinquency of a minor
         Specification 2: D runk and disorderly conduct
         Awarded : Susp ended:

- 20040716 :      Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20030422 :       For violating UCMJ Article 92 - Failure to obey order or regulation; violation of liberty policy.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for education benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends he did not smoke marijuana and was accused and discharged without any proof.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0912             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications) , Article 86 ( Absence without leave) , Article 134 (General A rticle , 2 specifications), and Article 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . By a vote of 3 to 0, the administrative board found the Applicant did not commit M isconduct (Drug Abuse) . By a vo te of 2 to 1, the board found the Applicant did commit a P atter n of M isconduct with his two previous NJPs and retention warning . The administrative board further recommended, by a vote of 3 to 0, that the Applicant be retained in the Na vy. The Commanding Officer, USS Vincennes did not concur with the administrative board’s recommendation for retention and recommended the Applicant be separated Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Commander, Carrier Strike Group Five concurred with separation but recommended a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization for a P attern of M isconduct. The Separation Authority ( Commander, Navy Personnel Command ) ultimately determined to separate the Applicant for a Pattern of Misconduct with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for education benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he did not smoke marijuana and was accused and discharged without any proof. Although the Applicant was found guilty at NJP for violating UCMJ Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances) , he was not separated for Misconduct (D rug A buse ) . Even without the NJP for violation of Article 112a, the Applicant’s NJP of 22 April 2003, retention warning of 22 April 2003, and NJP of 05 November 2003 met the requirements for an administrative separation for a Pattern of Misconduct. His CO, however, did not initiate separation proceedings until after the third NJP for violating Article 112a. Per the Naval Military Personnel Manual, he was properly notified of administrative separation processing for all applicable bases, which in this case were Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct). The administrative separation board subsequently found the Applicant did not commit Misconduct (Drug Abuse) but did meet the requirements for separation due to a Pattern of Misconduct. Since the board also recommended retention, the final discharge determination was required to rise to the level of the Secretary of the Navy, who delegated this final decision to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command. After a complete review of the Applicant’s service records, the NDRB determined his discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarde d characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200679

Original file (ND1200679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200963

Original file (ND1200963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

of controlled substances, to wit: marijuana and methamphetamine) Awarded: Oral admonitionRIR Suspended: SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention Warning Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201719

Original file (ND1201719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201194

Original file (ND1201194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030709 - 20040323Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040324Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080815Highest Rank/Rate:AD3Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 41EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.2(5)Behavior:2.6(5)OTA: 3.34Awards and...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000256

Original file (MD1000256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

This issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief; there is no requirement or law that grants the NDRB the authority to re-characterize discharges based solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and the discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401061

Original file (ND1401061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Relief denied.Summary: After...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002280

Original file (ND1002280.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The board further recommended, by a vote of 3-0, that the Applicant be separated with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service but that the separation be suspended for 9 months. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s records, the NDRB determined that the Applicant received leniency in being recommended for a General discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902528

Original file (ND0902528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002108

Original file (MD1002108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant agreed to plead guilty, to waive his right to an administrative board hearing, and to cooperate with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service; in consideration, the command agreed to withdraw the charges from a punitive court-martial venue and refer to the lesser administrative, non-punitive summary court-martial.On 02 June 2009, the Separation Authority approved the command’s recommendation for separation and directed the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001718

Original file (MD1001718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Though the Applicant was also notified of administrative separation for Personality Disorder, the separating authority (Commanding General, 2 nd Marine Division) properly directed that the Applicant be separated for a Pattern of Misconduct.Additionally, though the Applicant stated that he...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300479

Similar Decisions