Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000411

Original file (MD1000411.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20091117

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19930728 - 19940711     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19940712     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19970321      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 10 D a y ( s ) MOS: 7251
Education Level:        AFQT: 69
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA /CONF :       UA 19960708-19960709 (2) , UA 19960713-19960813(31), UA 19961209-19970102 (25)
CONF 19970127-19970219 (23)

NJP:

- 19950315 :      Article (Cheat ing on PFT)
         Awarded: Suspended: (suspended 4 mo nth s)

- 19951116 :      Article (Failure to obey order, regulation) , 2 specifications
         Specification 1: Driving with suspended license , o/o 19950916
         Specification 2: Driving with suspended license , o/o 19950925
         Awarded : Susp ended: (suspended 2 months)

- 19960813 :      Article (Absence without leave), 2 specifications
         Specification 1: UA 19960708-19960710
         Specification 2: UA 19960713-19960813
         Article (Driving with suspended license )
         Awarded : CC (30 days) Susp ended: (suspended 2 months)
         Appeal submitted 19960819

SCM:

- 19970127 :       Art icle (Absence without leave), 19961209-19970103 (25 days)
         Sentence :

SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19950315 :       For your misconduct which resulted in one nonjudicial punishment. This type of behavior will not be tolerated.

- 19950316 :       For your failure to maintain proper physical fitness standards IAW MCO 6100.3J.

- 19950414 :       For using poor judgment by frequent involvement with civilian authorities (minor traffic violations). This behavior will not be tolerated.

- 19951122 :       For your misconduct, specifically driving with a suspended license on 16 Sep and 25 Sep 1995.

- 19960813 :       For your misconduct, specifically receiving NJP on or about 19960813 for violating Articles 86 and 92 of the UCMJ.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”
         “ MISCONDUCT ”
“ 960708-960709 (2), 960713-960813 (31), 961209-970102 (25) , 970127-970219 (23) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 January 1997 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1. Applicant contends he was wrongfully discharged due to unjust UCMJ violations by his command and that he was too naïve to understand the implications .

Decision
Date: 20 1 1 01 20 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 retention counseling warnings for: M isconduct resulting in NJP (15 Mar 95); F ailure to maintain physical fitness standards (16 Mar 95); F requent involvement with civilian authorities (14 Apr 95); D riving with a suspended license (22 Nov 95); and M isconduct resulting in NJP (13 Aug 96). The record also reflected for o f the Un i form Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 3 specifications: 08-10 Jul 96 (2 days) ; 13 Jul-13 Aug 96 ( 31 days ) ; and 09 Dec 96- 0 2 Jan 97 (25 days ) ); Article 92 ( Failure to obey order, regulation, 4 specifications: Cheating on PFT, date NFIR; Driving with suspended license, 16 Sep 95, 25 Sep 95, and one other date NFIR ) and for of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Absence without leave , UA 09 Dec 96-03 Jan 97 ). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative separation board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was wrongfully discharged due to unjust UCMJ violations by his command and that he was too naïve to understand the implications.
On his Application for Discharge Review (DD-293), the Applicant challenges several charges of misconduct in his service record for which he had received multiple commanding officer NJP s and retention warning s/ counseling s . Besides the Applicant's statement on the DD - 293, he failed to provide any additional documentation and evidence on his behalf to support his claim s . On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD F orm 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6." (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). Additionally, upon receipt of the Applicant's DD Form 293, the NDRB mails an acceptance letter that includes the Information Concerning Review Procedures, which discusses the submission of additional documents in paragraph 3, Submission of Evidence, and in the last section on page 4, Information Pertaining to a Review Based Upon Post-Service Conduct . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant's statements alone, without sufficient documentary evidence, are not enough to form a basis of relief. Therefore, the Board found this issue to be without merit. Additionally, at the time of separation, the Applicant signed several documents explaining, in detail, the nature of his Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge and the effects it would have in subsequent civilian life. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700492

Original file (ND0700492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Issue 3 (): When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19870207 - 19870503Active: 19870504 - 19930414 Period of Service Under Review:...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101211

Original file (ND1101211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. In lieu of the full...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800153

Original file (ND0800153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901431

Original file (MD0901431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore,...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801789

Original file (ND0801789.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the time served and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701068

Original file (ND0701068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19920806 - 19930124Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19930125Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19950315Length of Service: 02 Yrs 01Mths21 DysLost Time:Days UA: 1 Days Confined: Education...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100088

Original file (MD1100088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Clemency denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the punitive discharge separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400639

Original file (MD1400639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901796

Original file (MD0901796.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Specification 2: On 2 Nov 2006, UA from roll call 0715-0745.Article , (Failure to obey an order or regulation): Driving on a suspended license. The NDRB found there was insufficient evidence to determine that the Applicant was suffering from PTSD or that his mental state was a mitigating factor in his misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200920

Original file (ND1200920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

When notified of administrative separation processing for Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense), Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct), and Misconduct (Civil Conviction) using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000411

Similar Decisions