Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001072

Original file (MD1001072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100329

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20000908 - 20001210     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20001211     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20041220      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 10 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 51
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle LOA

Periods of UA :    20030102-200301 09 ( 8 )

NJP:

- 20030320 :      Article , Unauthorized absence on or about 1630, 20021216 (Failed to check in from leave)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20030328 :      Article , Larceny (Stole property of an unknown value)
         Article , Assault (Was in an altercation with the 1 ^st Battalion, 25 ^th Marines ADNCO)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20031015 :      Article , Unauthorized absence (0600 , 20030711-1230 , 20030717)
         Article , Failure to obey order or regulation ( Disobeyed a lawful order given by GYSGT)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20020508 :      For assignment to weight control.

- 20031117 :      For failure to maintain rules and regulations governing the UCMJ.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE OBLIGATION .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       Wants to receive GI Bill money for college.
2.       Wants to improve employment opportunities.
3 .       The Applicant contends the positive aspects of his record of service outweigh the negative and warrant consideration for the characterization of his discharge to be upgraded to Honorable.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 0331          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and non-judicial punishments for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized Absence, 2 specifications) , Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation), Article 121 (Larceny ), and Article 128 ( Assault). A lthough the Applicant served for the duration of his contract, his average proficiency and conduct marks did not meet the minimum require d to characterize his service as Honorable. Standards of performance and conduct as determined by MCO P1610.7 series ( Performance Evaluation System ) , MCO P1070.12 series ( Individual Records Administration Manual (IRAM) ) , and customs of the service form the primary basis for determining characterization of service. The minimum acceptable average proficiency and conduct markings during an enlistment are 3.0 and 4.0 , respectively. The Applicant’s failure to achieve the standard s for proficiency result ed in his service being characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions).

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to receive the GI Bill money for college and enhance his employment opportunities . The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of obtaining v eterans' benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing educational or employment opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends the positive aspects of his record of service outweigh the negative and warrant consideration for the characterization of his discharge to be upgraded to H onorable. Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, an Honorable characterization upon expiration of active service is appropriate when the quality of the Marine’s service has met the standards of accepted conduct and performance of duty for military personnel. Therefore, characterization will be honorable for Marines with average proficiency marks of 3.0 or higher and average conduct marks of 4.0 or higher. Although the Applicant complete d his obligated service , his overall marks for proficiency and conduct did not meet the requirement to issue him an Honorabl e characterization of service. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, however, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board determined the positive aspects of the Applicant’s service and sacrifice in combat greatly outweighed the negative aspects of his service evidenced by his proficiency and conduct markings . The NDRB voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of the discharge.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the board voted unanimously that the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001522

Original file (MD1001522.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment opportunities2.The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable,because his average Pro/Con marks met the required standard.3. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000822

Original file (MD1000822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant completed his required active service and was separated with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) due to substandard conduct marks. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001146

Original file (MD1001146.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Decisional issues: The Applicant contends that he warranted an Honorable characterization of service at discharge vice the General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge characterization that he received if his proficiency and conduct marks were corrected administratively. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service and his service and medical record entries, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001038

Original file (MD1001038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the Applicant completed his service obligation,his record of service included evidence of significant negative aspects, and his average conduct marks did not meet the requirement to issue him an Honorable characterization. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstancesunique to this case,including the Applicant’s service in Iraq, the NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the discharge action.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801827

Original file (MD0801827.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization as determined by the Commanding General was appropriate and an upgrade founded on the Applicant’s record of service would be inappropriate. Although the Applicant does not explicitly state this in his Application, the NDRB conducted a review based on this presumption. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901736

Original file (MD0901736.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Reenlistment/RE-code : Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902572

Original file (MD0902572.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901687

Original file (MD0901687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101475

Original file (MD1101475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201225

Original file (MD1201225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20050926Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050927Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100926Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:63MOS: 6821Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle (2)(2)...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001072

Similar Decisions