Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902516

Original file (ND0902516.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-IT3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090909

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20050607 - 20060110     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060111     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20090630      Highest Rank/Rate: IT3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 20 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 93
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.3 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.08

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :
- 20060223 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation – 20060215 wrongfully using racially explicit language)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20060302 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation – 20060225 wrongfully making inappropriate comments toward other recruits - 2 specifications
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :

SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:
- 20060112 :      For fraudulent induction by failing to disclose required basic eligib ility information: Shoplifting- petty larceny at Fort Bragg, NC. P aid $200 fine and 40 hours community service.
- 20060223 :      For violation of A rticle 92 resulted in NJP held this date.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :          From /To Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective 15 May 2009 until
25 April 2010, Article 1910-148, SEPARATION BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his discharge is i nequitable , because he served honorably for over 3 years.

Decision

Date: 2010 1022 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning s and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Failure to obey an order or regulation - 3 specifications , by wrongfully using racially explicit language and by wrongfully making inappropriate comments toward other recruits ). Based on the Applicant ’s admission that he is a homosexual , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to co nsult with a qualified counsel and to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, but exercised his rights to request an administrative board. At the Administrative Separation Board (ASB), the Board determined, by a unanimous vote (3-0), that the preponderance of evidence support ed the alleged acts or omissions in the notification and that the Applicant should be separated from the Navy with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization. The separating authority approved the ASB’s recommendation and properly discharged the Applicant.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because he served honorably for over 3 years and that there was no improper conduct on his behalf, just self-admission.
T he Applicant’s in-service statement to his chain of command that he was a homosexual created a rebuttable presumption that he engaged in, or had the propensity to engage in , homosexual acts. An inquiry was conducted based on the Applicant’s admission to determine that his statement was credible and was not made for the purpose of avoiding further training. Furthermore , the Applicant appeared before an A dministrative S eparation B oard , which took into account a statement from another Sailor that the Applicant had solicited this Sailor to conduct homosexual acts . Based on the allegations , the ASB made an informed decision and recommendation to the command. The command agreed with the ASB’s recommendation and discharged the Applicant accordingly. Additionally, the ASB took into consideration the Applicant’s two Page 13 warnings and two NJPs in recommending separation with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s separation by reason of homosexual conduct (statement) with a General discharge was equitable and proper. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT (STATEMENT) . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000921

Original file (ND1000921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030410 - 20040331Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040401Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090522Highest Rank/Rate:UT2Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)22 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 47EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.8(6)Behavior:3.3(6)OTA: 3.56Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900949

Original file (ND0900949.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. In this case, the member admitted to the ASB that “we went back to the barracks” and “I was on his bed and that’s when the act happened.” After carefully reviewing the evidence of record, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000146

Original file (ND1000146.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative board. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002173

Original file (ND1002173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100993

Original file (ND1100993.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his commanding officer’s recommendation was to not separate him. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000453

Original file (ND1000453.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Furthermore, the NDRB reviewed MILPERSMAN section 1910-148, which provides details and guidance on administrative separations for homosexual misconduct, to determine whether the characterization of service was equitable based on the aforementioned misconduct and the Applicant’s totality of service during the enlistment period in which he was discharged. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002196

Original file (ND1002196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902407

Original file (ND0902407.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative separation board (ASB). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100307

Original file (ND1100307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101290

Original file (ND1101290.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain UNSATPARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902516

Similar Decisions