Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902407

Original file (ND0902407.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-CTT2, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090825

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19910 627 - 19920102     Active:          19920103 - 19951203
                                             19951204 - 20010426

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20010427     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050607      Highest Rank/Rate: CTT1
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 11 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 59
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.5 ( 6 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 6 )        OTA: 3.74

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Pistol (3) J MUA JSAM (2) NMC A M (3)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :
- 20041202 :      Article (Failure to obey an order or regulation - 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Wrongfully engaging in a sexual relationship with a Seaman
         Specification 2: Wrongfully arranging for a personal engagement with a Seaman
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20050504 :       For failure to meet Physical Readiness Test Standards.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL (3), JOINT MERITORIOUS UNIT AWARD, JOINT SERVICE ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL (2), GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL (3), NAVY AND MARINE CORPS OVERSEAS SERVICE RIBBON, NAVY PISTOL MARKSMANSHIP RIBBON ”
         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 920103 UNTIL 010426 ”
         “ MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :          From /To Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until 11 June 2008,
Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article (Failure to obey an order or regulation).

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable and improper , because it was based on an isolated incident in 13.5 years .
2. The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.

Decision

Date: 201009 16 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Failure to obey an order or regulation - 2 specifications: by wrongfully arranging for a personal engagement and engaging in a sexual relationship with a Seaman). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative separation board (ASB) . The Applicant appeared before the ASB to present his case. T he ASB unanimously (3-0) voted that the preponderance of the evidence supported the alleged acts that resulted in misconduct due to commission of a serious offense , that the Applicant should be separated from the Navy , and that he be discharged with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization. The separating command agreed with the ASB’s recommendation and approved the Applicant’s discharge from the Navy.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable and improper , because it was based on an isolated incident in 13.5 years. Despite a Sailor’s prior record of se rvice, certain serious offenses, even though isolate d, warrant separation from the n aval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. An Under Other Than Honorable C onditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. As an instructor of new recruits, the Navy put its trust and confidence in the Applicant to maintain a professional relationship with recruits at all times. Although the Applicant claims his case had many inconsistencies, the NDRB could find no irregularities in the Applicant’s ASB nor did the Applicant provide any evidence or information to back up his claims. The NDRB determined that the command ’ s actions were warranted and that the discharge was proper. Additionally, the Separating Authority, Naval Service Training Command, properly reviewed the separation package and authorized the discharge.

The separation code GKQ is proper and is appropriate for “involuntary discharge, approved recommendation of a board. (Use when administrative board was held.)” per Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until 11 June 2008, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant believes his post-service is worthy of consideration. Although the Applicant provided character references from former shipmates and work, he failed to provide any additional documentary evidence on his behalf for post-service consideration. To warrant an upgrade , the Applicant’s post - service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Applicant could have produced evidence as stated in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the addendum with the full understanding completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade. Based on the limited post-service documentary evidence, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900949

Original file (ND0900949.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. In this case, the member admitted to the ASB that “we went back to the barracks” and “I was on his bed and that’s when the act happened.” After carefully reviewing the evidence of record, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101669

Original file (ND1101669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201185

Original file (ND1201185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s DD Form 293 and the documentation he submitted in support of his contentions, his service record, the ASB proceedings, letter of deficiency, and Separation Authority’s decision and determined there was no impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge process, his characterization of service, or the Narrative Reason for Separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902516

Original file (ND0902516.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT (STATEMENT). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001652

Original file (ND1001652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000921

Original file (ND1000921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030410 - 20040331Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040401Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090522Highest Rank/Rate:UT2Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)22 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 47EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.8(6)Behavior:3.3(6)OTA: 3.56Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200067

Original file (ND1200067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends his record of service warrants an upgrade. The civilian conviction provided the preponderance of the evidence that he committed a serious offense, he elected an ASB, the ASB determined he committed the offenses and recommended a General discharge, and the Separation Authority reviewed the findings and ordered the Applicant to be discharged. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900697

Original file (ND0900697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200494

Original file (MD1200494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001358

Original file (MD1001358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902407

Similar Decisions