Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901799

Original file (ND0901799.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SHSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090611

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20070213 - 20070614     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070615     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20080905      Highest Rank/Rate: SH SN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 21 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 55
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.91

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 2 0080801 :       Article (UA 0700, 20080616, until 0020, 20080617 )
         Awarded : 30 DAYS CCU Susp ended:

S CM : SPCM:

C C :
- 20080826 :       Offense: Reckless Driving and Driving without a License
         Sentence : NFIR

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20080801 :       For article 86, absent without leave.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :          From /To Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Wants to reenlist in the Navy.
2. Found not guilty of two traffic violations.
Decision

Date: 20 10 0527 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (MINOR OFFENSES) .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning; one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, a day); and one civilian conviction for reckless driving and driving without a license. Based on numerous disciplinary infractions committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualifi ed counsel and request a General Court-Martial Co nvening Authority (GCMA) review, but elected to submit a written statement .

Issue 1 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to reenlist in the Navy. The NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces and is not authorized to change a reentry code.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was found not guilty of two traffic violations, which led to his discharge. The Applicant failed to provide any documentation to verify that his charges were dropped. Per his letter dated 2 September 2008, the Applicant’s commanding officer stated the Applicant was found guilty of reckless drivin g and driving without a license, and “had numerous disciplinary infractions. ” “ His chain of command has counseled him and put forth a tremendous amount of effort in order to correct his deficiencies. He has been given ample time and opportunity to be successful, but has failed in doing so.” Since the NDRB could not verify the number of “numerous disciplinary infractions” and based on the Appli cant’s last evaluation report and counseling report found in his service record, the presumption of regularity was applied. Based on the commanding officer’s letter and the Applicant’s statement to the police , the NDRB determined the Applicant was guilty of the traffic violations , but the traffic violations by themselves would not have been the sole basis for separation. His unauthorized absence and numerous other infractions contributed to his early relesase from the U.S. Navy on the grounds of Misconduct. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found T herefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 30 May 2008 until 9 November 2009, Article 1910-138, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - MINOR DISCIPLINARY INFRACTIONS.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101211

Original file (ND1101211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. In lieu of the full...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601087

Original file (ND0601087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Equity – In Service Conduct Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990219 - 19990630 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990701Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 20020509 Length of Service: Active: 02Yrs 10 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any. Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20000419: Civil Conviction: General District Court, Traffic Division, Chesapeake, Virginia for...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800153

Original file (ND0800153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801042

Original file (ND0801042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Considering the NJP for the Article 111 violation and the numerous civilian violations, which are considered more than minor traffic violations, the Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200920

Original file (ND1200920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

When notified of administrative separation processing for Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense), Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct), and Misconduct (Civil Conviction) using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300487

Original file (ND1300487.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for service-related health benefits.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100034

Original file (ND1100034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the Applicant’s service record, the NDRB is convinced his command considered his decision to turn himself in to authorities and determined that the General discharge was warranted and was in keeping with the type of discharge given to others with similar misconduct. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600989

Original file (ND0600989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20050825Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCT - alcohol abuse rehabilitation failureLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050825Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board NOT APPLICABLEObtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLESeparation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER,...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901426

Original file (MD0901426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200418

Original file (MD1200418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. After considering all the facts and circumstances specific to the Applicant’s case, his command placed him on a six-month period of LIMDU to allow him to receive extensive PTSD counseling/treatment and alcohol rehabilitation program aftercare through his EAOS. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901799

Similar Decisions