Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901775
Original file (ND0901775.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090610
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN []


 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20070613 - 20071031     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20071101     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20071206      Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 06 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 81
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A    OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE
Periods of UA /C ONF : NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C :
Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 3 May 2005 until 16 May 2008, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Wants his reentry (RE) code changed to reenlist in the military.
2. Doesn’t have a chronic lower back condition.
Decision

Date: 20 10 0527             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER) .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no evidence of misconduct that resulted in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. During recruit training, the Applicant complained of lower back pain and on 8 November 2007, was diagnosed with chronic [back] pain, existed prior to enlistment (EPTE) and recommended for entry level medical separation (ELMS) . When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure for defective enlistments and inductions – erroneous enlistment and fraudulent entry into Naval service , the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Co nvening Authority (GCMA) review .

Issue 1 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant w ants his reentry (RE) code changed to reenlist in the military. T he NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces and is not authorized to change a reentry code. See the Addendum paragraph, Reenlistment/RE-code , for more information.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he doesn’t have a chronic lower back condition. Per his letter dated 3 November 2007, the commanding officer, Recruit Training Command , stated, “Additionally, SN [Applicant]’ failure to disclose a history of back problems prior to entry into the Naval service necessitates an RE-4 code due to fraud.” On his Report of Medical History (DD Form 2807-1) dated 13 June 2007, the Applicant marked, “NO” to block 12.c. Have you ever had or do you now have: Recurrent back pain or any back problem.” On his Report of Medical Examination (DD Form 2808) dated 13 June 2007, the physician marked, “Abnormal” to block 34, Lower extr e mities (except feet) and commented in block 44 (Notes) “34 difficulty to squat [unreadable] walk [unreadable] back.” In block 77 (Summary of defects and diagnoses), the physician wrote, “Back ache 1 week [unreadable] unknown – recruit claims not causing any functional impairment – NDQ.” I n the Applicant’s chronological record of medical care dated 8 November 2007, the physician wrote, “History of back injury declared at MEPS. Pt had a single episode of back spasm. Seen by chiropractor and back pain resolved within three months. No problems since that time. ” After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned an impropriety in the discharge action since the Applicant had disclosed his pre-service back issues, but no inequity in the characterization of service. By unanimous vote, the NDRB determined Erroneous Entry (Other) is a more appropriate narrative reason for separation.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found proper but the narrative summary was not correct. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative re ason for separation shall change to ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER) .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900630

    Original file (ND0900630.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Desires discharge characterization changed to “ Honorable ” .2. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900907

    Original file (ND0900907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his time in service (20 days), lack of unusual circumstances in conduct and performance, and reason for separation, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service was appropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900544

    Original file (ND0900544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20070622 - 20080227Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20080228Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080328Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)01 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 46EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700128

    Original file (ND0700128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Separation Authority (date): BUPERS (19970819)Reason for discharge directed: PHYSICAL DISABILITY WITH SEVERANCE PAY Characterization directed: NONEDate Applicant Discharged: 19971024 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201797

    Original file (ND1201797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants to receive health insurance.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501484

    Original file (ND0501484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960102: ACB-Medical Department: Right ankle pain ? If pain persist > 2 days would have patient follow up at OB/GYN for u/s eval. P: Motrin with food for pain.

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700789

    Original file (MD0700789.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20020620 - 20030615Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030616Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060512Length of Service: 02...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300348

    Original file (MD1300348.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Full relief by changing the narrative reason for separation was not granted, because the Applicant was properly separated for a Condition Not a Disability.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601177

    Original file (ND0601177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20000525Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20000525Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Separation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER, CORRY STATION, PENSACOLA (20000613)Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800906

    Original file (ND0800906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...