Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900630
Original file (ND0900630.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090123
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20070823 - 20080617     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20080618     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20080805      Highest Rank/Rate: AR
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 18 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 40
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR   OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NONE Periods of UA /C ONF :

20080721: Applicant diagnosed with chronic left hip pain with musculoskeletal weakness (hip pain with muscle we akness).

NJP : SCM: SPCM: CC: Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

20081009: Letter of support from Dr. R . A. O .
2008 1104 : Letter of support from Dr. J . C. S .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 22, effective 16 May 2008 until Present, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Desires discharge c haracterization change d to “ Honorable ” .
2. Desires n arrative reason change d to Erroneous.

Decision

Date: 20                  Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE .
Discussion

 Issues 1-2 : ( ) . The Applicant contends she is entitled to a discharge characterization upgrade and change in n arrative r eason because Navy medical staff misinterpreted her diagnosis upon entering the military. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s re cord of service was marred by the Applicant’s failure to disclose a pre-existing back injury on DD Form 2807-1 (Medical History) prior to entering the military. In support of her request t he Applicant provided two letters of support from civilian medical personnel. The letter dated 09 October 2008, s tates the Applicant made a minimum of two pre-service visits to Dr. R . A. O . ’s practice (Girard Family Health Care) for lower back pain on 21 July 2006 and again on 22 September 2007. The incident on 21 July 2006 was for a wor k related slip injury, and the incident on 22 September 2007 was due to hitting the hood of a car. The letter dated 04 November 2008, states the Applicant made a post service visit to Dr. J . C. S . practice (Sevich Chiropractic Healthcare Center) on 14 August 2008 for pain and weakness in the hips.

The Applicant entered active military service on 18 June 2008 , and was diagnosed with chronic left hip pain with musculoskeletal weakness on 21 July 2008; 33 days into boot camp. Upon entry into the military, the Applicant failed to list either of the pre - service incide n ts on DD Form 2807-1 (Medical History). The failure to disclose prior medical issues on DD Form 2807-1 (Medical History) constitutes a Narrative Reason of Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service. In this case , with regard to DD Form 2807-1 (Medical History), specifically failing to answer yes in Block 12c – “Have you ever had or do you have: Recurrent back pain or any back problem”; Block 23 – “Have you ever had any illness or injury other than those already noted? (If yes, specify when, where, and give details) ” and Block 24 – “Have you ever consulted or been treated by clinics, physicians , healers, or other practitioners within the past 5 years for other than minor illnesses? (If yes, give complete address of doctor, hospital, clinic, and details.). The Applicant was subsequently diagnosed on 21 July 2008, by military medical physician with chronic left hip pain with musculoskeletal weakness (hip pain with muscle weakness), and processed for administrative separation from military service.
The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization and narrative reason were appropriate and an upgrade and change was not warranted.

With respect to non-service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an “Uncharacterized” separation is considered the equivalent of an “Honorable” or “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” discharge. The Applicant should be aware in cases where a discharge is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active duty an “Uncharacterized” discharge is directed unless misconduct occurs which warrants a lesser characterization, or an “Honorable” discharge is approved by the Secretary of the Navy for unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of military duties. It is clear no such circumstance exists in the Applicant’s case on either account. As a result, the appropriate discharge characterization would be “Uncharacterized”.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400533

    Original file (ND1400533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900837

    Original file (ND0900837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” The Board determined the Applicant did not fully disclose pre-service knee problems and the narrative reason for separation was appropriate.For the edification of the Applicant, an Uncharacterized (Entry Level Separation) discharge is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active duty. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101230

    Original file (ND1101230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:MEDICAL DISCHARGE Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080114 - 20080414Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080415Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080515Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Years Month01 DayEducation Level:AFQT: 35EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEBehavior:NONEOTA: NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900907

    Original file (ND0900907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his time in service (20 days), lack of unusual circumstances in conduct and performance, and reason for separation, the Board determined the awarded characterization of service was appropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101648

    Original file (ND1101648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00043

    Original file (MD04-00043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Medically incapable.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. However, he dislocated this the first time on 08/03/2001. Applicant will be processed for fraudulent enlistment due to a preservice undisclosed history of recurrent shoulder dislocations.030513: Applicant’s statement: [I was told by SSgt H_ to conceal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100958

    Original file (ND1100958.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301100

    Original file (MD1301100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300481

    Original file (ND1300481.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:MEDICAL Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20090305 - 20091213Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20091214Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100204Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Years Months21 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 35EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:NOBOTA: NOBAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901775

    Original file (ND0901775.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.