Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901771
Original file (ND0901771.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090610
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020122 - 20020129     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20020130     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20040517      Highest Rank/Rate: HN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 18 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 69
Evaluation M arks: Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )    Behavior: 2.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.0

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :
- 20040422 :      Article (Wrongful use of controlled substance, marijuana 43NG/ML)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         

Oth er Documentation :   







Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Wants to participate in ROTC program .
2.       Excellent in-service record with one incident during period of strain and distress.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0204             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Wrongful use of a controlle d substance, marijuana 43 NG/ML). No information was available in the record as to whether or not the Applicant entered service on a drug waiver. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified coun sel, submit a written statement and request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant expressed a desire to join a R eserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) program. The Board applauds the Applicant for his enrollment and courses completed at the University of Guam. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of a program such as ROTC. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( Equity ) . The Applicant contends that “under tremendous strain and emotional distress” he made a terrible decision. Four months prior to the UCMJ violation, his mother was diagnosed with advanced liver disease , a terminal condition without a transplant, by a physician in Los Angeles, CA and was not able to return to her home in Guam. The record does not show any other misconduct by the Applicant during his period of service and the Board acknowledges the Applicant’s commendatory record of service prior to the incident which led to his discharge . The Applicant provides no documented information he informed his chain of command of family problems and did not receive the assistance, leave, or help he asked for. Additionally, the Applicant neither makes mention of, nor provides documented proof, whether he attempted to use any one of the numerous family support programs sponsored by or for military service members. These programs and services, such as Fleet and Family Support Center, Navy and Marine Corps Relief Society, American Red Cross, the Chaplain, or even Navy medical health personnel if needed, provide services to members of the military, regardless of grade, in times of need. T he NDRB advises the Applicant certain serious offenses warrant separation from the service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a minimum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for an administrative discharge. An upgrade would be inappropriate.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the actio n of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700496

    Original file (ND0700496.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable due to inconsistencies in documentation of his alcohol dependency.The service records that the Board reviewed indicate the following: 1) The Applicant went to NJP 20041014 for drunk and disorderly conduct in Guam and damage to government property, 2) completed Alcohol Impact 20041104, 3) was diagnosed as alcohol dependent by a psychologist 20050222, 4) went to NJP on 20050224 for drunk and disorderlyconduct and assault on a commissioned...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901839

    Original file (ND0901839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700309

    Original file (ND0700309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that the discharge was proper but not equitable in the characterization of service. NAVAL HOSPITAL, GUAM (20040302)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20040405 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200393

    Original file (ND1200393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902323

    Original file (ND0902323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601017

    Original file (ND0601017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation Record not available. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE Date Notified:19990811Reason for Processing:CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19990811Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Administrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101508

    Original file (ND1101508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant wants the Separation Code, along with its corresponding Narrative Reason for Separation, changed. Relief denied.Issue 4: (Decisional) () .The Applicant suggests her post-service conduct, as evidenced by her college attendance, warrants consideration for changing her character of service, separation code, and narrative reason.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in changing the characterization of a discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201042

    Original file (MD1201042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement to the Secretary of Navy, but waived his right to request resignation in lieu of separation processing.The Applicant provided no additional documentation for the NDRB’s consideration or to rebut the Government’s presumption of regularity that was not already documented in his official military record of service and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001239

    Original file (ND1001239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The record of evidence reflects the Applicant met the requirements for processing by reason of Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) and was properly and equitably discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) for Misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400514

    Original file (ND1400514.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB is not authorized to change a Narrative Reason for Separation to enhance eligibility for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that her Narrative Reason for Separation is incorrect.There is no documentation in the Applicant’s service record that directs the specific reason for the Applicant’s release from active duty, which would have been ordered by Commander, Navy...