Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201042

Original file (MD1201042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120406

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: SUBSTANDARD PERFORMANCE

Authority for Discharge: (corrected) SECNAVINST 1920.6C

Applicant’s Request:      Narrative Reason change to: REDUCTION IN FORCE

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USN (ROTC)     20070129 - 20080807 ELS          Active:          20090109 - 20090319 HON
USN (ROTC)      20080828 - 20090108 COG

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Appointment : 20090320     Age:
Years Contracted : Indefinite
Date of Discharge: 20100512       Highest Rank : 2NDLT
Length of Service: Year Month 23 D ay s
Education Level:         AFQT: NFIR
Officer’s Fitness reports: Available

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      Rifle SS Pistol SS

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    CC:      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDR B did note administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

         “ SECNAVINST 1920.6C ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS), effective 15 December 2005 until PRESENT establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 March 1997.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends he was involuntarily separated due to a reduction in force.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0301 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Character of Service shall HONORABLE .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall SUBSTANDARD PERFORMANCE .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in non-judicial punishment or court-martial. However, the record reflects the Applicant was administratively processed for separation by his command for Subst andard Performance while a student at The Basic School as a result of failing to complete the Basic Officer Course . When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement to the Secretary of Navy , but waived his right to request resignation in lieu of separation processing.

The Applicant provided no additional documentation for the NDRB’s consideration or to rebut the Government’s presumption of regularity that was not already documented in his official military record of service and medical record.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was involuntarily separated due to a reduction in force. The record reflects the Applicant’s consistent poor performance and failure to complete the Basic Officer Course resulted in his command administratively process ing him for separation with a recommendation of an H onorable characterization for Substandard Performance . Consequently, the Applicant stated in his rebuttal letter dated 20 October 2009 that, “ I have tried throughout my training at The Basic School to meet the standards required of a Marine officer. I have failed because of my weak leadership traits, not from a lack of effort. ” The final determination of the narrative reason for separation reside s with the Sectary of the Navy, or his delegates, in accordance with Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C. The Applicant’s service record s and discharge package w ere reviewed , and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved his discharge . After a complete review of the records, t he NDRB determined he was not involuntarily separated due to a reduction in force but was properly discharged for Substandard Performance. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain SUBSTANDARD PERFORMANCE . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301311

Original file (MD1301311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200894

Original file (ND1200894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Narrative Reason for Discharge:Authority for Discharge:SECNAVINST 1920.6C The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s record of service included significant misconduct that warranted his separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000836

Original file (MD1000836.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issue 1. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the narrative reason for separation is not warranted.The Applicant provided letters written by his chain of command recommending to the final separating authority his reason for separation as Substandard Performance. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500127

Original file (MD1500127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500187

Original file (ND1500187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FAILED TO SELECT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted,...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301487

Original file (MD1301487.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19961123 - 19970506Active:USMCR 19970505 - 20000817 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Appointment: 20000818Age: 24Years Contracted: Indefinite Date of Discharge: 20060714 Highest Rank: FIRST LIEUTENANTLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 28 Day(s) Education Level: AFQT: 75Officer’s Fitness reports: AvailableAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle (2)...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101366

Original file (ND1101366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Applicant contends his...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301574

Original file (ND1301574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:None Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Appointment: 19900820Age at appointment:Date of Discharge:20100901Highest Rank/Rate:LCDRLength of Service: Inactive: 16 Years Months 02 Days Active Years Months 12 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: NFIROfficer’s Fitness Reports: AvailableAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle Pistol JMUA CGMUC NDSM (2)(2) CGSOSR (2) SWOPeriods...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200388

Original file (ND1200388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the Applicant received due process during the separation process and was properly and equitably discharged Under Honorable Conditions (General) for Misconduct (Other). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901238

Original file (ND0901238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service:Inactive: USN (DEP) 20050920 - 20051024 Active: 20051025 - 20071108 HON Period of Service Under Review:Date of Appointment : 20071109Age: 25Years Contracted: Indefinite Date of Discharge: 20090331 Highest Rank : ENSLength of Service: 01 Year(s) 04Month(s) 22 Day(s) Education Level: BS Officer’s Fitness reports: Not Available Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle Pistol Periods of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201042

Similar Decisions