Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902375
Original file (MD0902375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090825
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20020410 - 20020728     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20020729     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20050 5 29      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 01 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 62
MOS: 0331/8152
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): /          Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol (2) LoA

Periods of UA / CONF :     NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20040114 :      For assignment to the Marine Corps BCP.
- 20040603 :      For unsatisfactory performance while assigned to Marine Corps BCP. Has not met weight/body fat standards.
- 20040714 :      For making satisfactory progress on the Marine Corps BCP program, first assignment, but failure to reach required body composition while on Marine Corps BCP. Authorized extension of 6 months on BCP due to satisfactory progress .

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:            Service / Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:     
         Additional Statements :
                   From Applicant:            From Representat ion :               From Congress member :    
         Other Documentation :     

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6215, WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1 .       Applicant requests his characterization of service be upgrade d to Honorable based on having served 32 months honorably without any legal or administrative issues outside of his weight control problem for which he was separated. Applicant contends that other service members have been separated for the same narrative reason with an H onorable characterization of service; it is equitable that he also receives an H onorable characterization of service.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0909            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue to the Board. As a function of the discharge review process, the Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his d ischarge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.

The Applicant’s record of service included three 6105 retention-counseling warnings and no violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice . The Applicant’s record did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whe ther the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel or submit a written statement . In this instance, t he Board must presume regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs that the Applicant was notified properly and was afforded his right to consult with counsel and to submit a statement to the separation authority.

Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( Equity ) . The Applicant contends that he served 32 months in the Marine Corp s honorably, without any legal or administrative issues, outside of his weight control problem. The Applicant contends that other service members are separated for the same narrative reason with an honorable characterization of service, so it is equitable that he also receives an h onorable characterization of service. The Applicant’s military service record contains no derogatory information. His Commanding Officer administratively reduced him to the pay grade of E-2 (Private First Class) for his weight control failure. Pursuant to the Marine Corp Separation and Retirement Manual, the characterization of separation should be Honorable , unless a General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted . The NDRB determined the Applicant had no substandard performance or misconduct that would warrant a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization. The Applicant’s own chain of command provided character statements attesting to his excellent performance of duties and professional reliability. After a careful review of the Applicant's official records, and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action , but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The NDRB voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of the discharge, but the narrative reason for the discharge shall remain as issued.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400589

    Original file (MD1400589.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings. Applicable regulations state that characterization of service for administrative separations due to weight control failures will be Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) as warranted by the member’s service record. ” Additional...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801540

    Original file (MD0801540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends he is entitled to an upgrade since his Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) was not completed before he was discharged.The Applicant was the subject of a medical board conducted 10 January 2003. The record of evidence shows the Applicant was notified in writing by his Battalion Commander on 12 February 2003 he was recommending the Applicant be discharged with a “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” characterization of service. The Board determined an upgrade would be...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201230

    Original file (MD1201230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201109

    Original file (MD1201109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500820

    Original file (MD1500820.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, failure to meet Marine Corps standard for weight after a second assignment on BCP requires mandatory processing for administrative separation. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews :...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901324

    Original file (MD0901324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101557

    Original file (MD1101557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Due to (the Applicant’s) Weight Control Failure, he has become a liability for the Battalion, as well as the Marine Corps, and his presence jeopardizes the good order and discipline that the Marine Corps upholds.” On 14 April 2010, after considering the Applicant’s record of service, the chain of command recommendations, and the Applicant’s statement regarding his processing for administrative separation, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be discharged from the Marine...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500874

    Original file (MD1500874.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201301

    Original file (MD1201301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was administratively processed for separation for Weight Control Failure after he failed to maintain Marine Corps weight standards. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000841

    Original file (MD1000841.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 2 April 1998.The Applicant was administratively separated due to weight control failure after being assigned to the Body Composition Program (BCP) for one year.When notified of administrative separation processing, the Applicant exercised his right to consult with qualified counsel, but waived rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative board. However, even...