Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201301
Original file (MD1201301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120522
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20030902 - 20030914     Active:            20030915 - 20071002 HON
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20071003     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20110105      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 03 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 76
MOS: 0621
Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol (2) (2) LOA

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:              SCM:              SPCM:             CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20080730 :       For your first assignment for six months to the Marine Corps Body Composition Program. Specifically, you are not within height and weight standards as required by MCO P6100.12 . Your current height is 70 inches, weight 217 lbs, and body fat 25%. You are advised that the first assignment is for 6-month s .

- 20081006 :       For failure to maintain Marine Corps height and weight standards as evidenced by your weigh-in on 30 June 2008. Your height was recorded at 70 inches, your weight was 217 pounds, and your body fat was measured at 25%. Although you were already formally assigned to the BCP, MARADMIN 501/08 instructed units to re-evaluate all Marines currently on a BCP program and determine if they have made significant progress. Since you have not made satisfactory progress, in accordance with MARADMIN 501/08, you are hereby re-set back to day one of your initial assignment. Appropriate medical tests have determined that your deficiency is not due to an underlying cause or associated disease per MCO 6110.3. As of 6 October 2008, you are hereby re-assigned to a six-month BCP as your f irst assignment.

- 20090404 :       For your extension on the Marine Corps BCP. You have made reasonable progress but have failed to comply with established weight/body composition standards while on a one-time extension of 6 months to meet the body composition standards set forth in MCO 6110.3.

- 20091001 :       For assignment to the Marine Corps BCP.

- 20100419 :       For unsatisfactory performance while assigned to the Marine Corps BCP. Due to insufficient effort, you have not met your weight/body composition reduction goals.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE ”
         “ (28) 20040708 - 20040805 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6215, WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO 1900.16E), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends he had a medical condition that contributed to his failure to maintain Marine Corps weight standards.
2.       NDRB Issue: The Applicant’s discharge was inequitable.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0307            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings . The Applicant was administratively processed for separation for W eight C ontrol F ailure after he failed to maintain Marine Corps weight standards. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant elected to consult with a qualified counsel and request an administrative board. The administrative board found, by unanimous vote, that a preponderance of the evidence existed that the Applicant had failed to maintain weight standards, that he should be separated, and that his separation should not be suspended. However, the board split 2-1 on the characterization of discharge with the majority voting for General, and the minority voting for Honorable. The Separati on Authority concurred with the majority vote and administratively separated the Applicant with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization for Weight Control Failure.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he had a medical condition that contributed to his failure to maintain Marine Corps weight standards. The Applicant’s medical records show that he suffered leg and an k le pain during his enlistment , however, injuries are not excusable reasons for failure to maintain standards in accordance with Marine Corps orders. It is the responsibility of the individual Marine to maintain physical appearance and weight standards regardless of his duty status. The Applicant was provided ample opportunities, counseling, and resources to comply with weight standards but failed to do so. Further, his 6105 counseling on 6 October 2008 stated, “A ppropriate medical tests have determined that your deficiency is not due to an underlying cause or associated disease per MCO 6110.3.” The NDRB determined h is command acted properly and in compliance with Marine Corps orders in administratively separating him for Weight Control Failure . Relief denied.

: (NDRB Issue) (Decisional) ( ) . During the NDRB’s review of the Applicant’s record, an inequality was discovered in the Applicant’s character ization of service. Per paragraph 6215 (Weight Control Failure) of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, characterization of service should be Honorable unless a General is warranted. In his current enlistment, the Applicant had no misconduct or other significant negative aspects of service that warranted a General characterization. Therefore, the NDRB voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of service to Honorable. Relief granted.

 Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300907

    Original file (MD1300907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings.Based on the Applicant’s lack of progress in the Body Composition Program, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201125

    Original file (MD1201125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s unsatisfactory performance of duties while assigned to the Marine Corps Body CompositionProgram (BCP), command administratively processed for separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500509

    Original file (MD0500509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Concerning your assignment to the Marine Corps Body composition program. Applicant counseled that he will be processed for administrative separation due to failure to maintain the Marine Corps standards. The Commanding Office is recommending that the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions).

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400437

    Original file (MD1400437.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and on 21 January 2011 for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, cited...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600068

    Original file (MD0600068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant advised to loss 16 pounds or 5 percent body fat and maintain for 6-month BCP assignment period.021029: First Endorsement to CO’s ltr of 29 Oct 02. I am recommending that he receive a General under honorable conditions discharge.This recommendation is based upon the respondent’s failure to meet Marine Corps weight standards set forth by the Body Composition Program (BCP) . According to the reference, a Marine assigned to the BCP on two separate occasions (e.g., first and second...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201696

    Original file (MD1201696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings for unsatisfactory performance on the Marine Corps Body Composition Program (BCP). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002157

    Original file (MD1002157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200759

    Original file (MD1200759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    : (Decisional) () .The Applicant contends that it is inequitable that he did not receive an Honorable since he never had any disciplinary problems.Applicable regulations state that characterization of service for administrative separations due to Weight Control Failure will be Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) as warranted by the member’s service record. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500949

    Original file (MD1500949.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102000

    Original file (MD1102000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6206,...