Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902025
Original file (MD0902025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090707
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20010720 - 20020623     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20020624     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20040511      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 18 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
MOS: 1371
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20040311 :      For being diagnosed with personality disorder.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:            Service / Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:     
         Additional Statements :
                   From Applicant:            From Representat ion :               From Congress member :    
         Other Documentation :     

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6203.3 CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Wants reentry code changed.
2. Misdiagnosed by a psychologist .
 3. Reevaluated and given a “clean mental slate. ”

Decision

 Date: 20 10 0805            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one 6105 counseling warning , and no misconduct that resulted in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Per the Combat Engineer Battalion Surgeon letter dated 15 January 2004, the Applicant was evaluated by the Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton Mental Health Clinic and diagnosed with borderline personality d isorder. On 26 January 2004, the Applicant was again evaluated by the Camp Pendleton Mental Health Clinic and diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. On 11 March 2004, he received counseli ng for his personality disorder with recommendations for corrective actions. On 12 March 2004, the Applicant was notified by his commanding officer of his intent to recommend administrative separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing , the Applicant waived his right to consult with a qualified counsel, but d id submit a written statement when he was notified that an administrative separation package would be started. The Applicant was separated on 11 May 2004.

Issue 1 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant w ants his reentry (RE) code changed to reenlist . T he NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any oth er of the Armed Forces and is not authorized to change a reentry code. See the Addendum paragraph, Reenlistment/RE-code , for more information.

Issues 2-3 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was m isdiagnosed by a psychologist , and was reevaluated by a civilian family psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (FPMHNP) on 23 January 2009, and given a “clean mental slate ” (Axis II: no diagnosis). After the Applicant was counseled, t he NDRB found no evidence, nor did the Applicant provide any, to indicate he had overcome his deficiencies due to having a personality disorder while still in the Marine Corps. His post-servi ce mental health evaluation was conducted more than four years eight months after being separated, which the NDRB dete rmined was too long a period to have relevance on his in-service diagnosis.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. By majority rule, the NDRB voted to upgrade the characterization of service, but unanimously agreed not to change the narrative reason for separation. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600716

    Original file (MD0600716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 041221: Psychiatric Evaluation, B_, B_, Camp Pendleton Mental Health: Primary Diagnosis: AXIS II: Personality disorder NOS with Borderline traits Primary Recommendation: It is strongly recommended that this service member be expeditiously administratively separated on the basis of a personality disorder. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300014

    Original file (ND1300014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200457

    Original file (MD1200457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the documentation provided by the Applicant, the NDRB determined it did not provide sufficient evidence to overturn the in-service diagnosis of Dependent Personality Disorder and, therefore, relief based on this issue is not warranted. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700143

    Original file (MD0700143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain PERSONALITY DISORDER. Recommendation: Command should undertake administrative separation for unsuitability due to a personality disorder.19990108: Mental health Department, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton: Reason for visit: Depression, “I made a wrong decision about being in the Corps”, “I don’t know what’s best for me, the Marine Corps or my mother. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101748

    Original file (MD1101748.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was subsequently recommended for administrative separation from the Marine Corps. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500877

    Original file (ND0500877.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. The Navy is responsible. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board.

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902299

    Original file (MD0902299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based on the Applicant’s overall service record, the NDRB determined he did not warrant a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service and voted unanimously to upgrade his characterization to Honorable.Issue 2: (Decisional) (Equity) The NDRB did review this Issue, but since the NDRB granted full relief based on Issue 1, no further response is required.Summary: After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901141

    Original file (MD0901141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant states he suffered from slight mental anguish from these circumstances, which eventually led to a recommendation that he be expeditiously discharged from the Marine Corps due to personality disorder. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01350

    Original file (MD04-01350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of service "Uncharacterized" or entry-level separation unless there were unusual circumstances regarding performance or conduct, which would merit an...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100135

    Original file (MD1100135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s record of service, medical officer recommendations for administrative separation due to OCD, and future potential for service, the Applicant’s Commanding Officer processed him for administrative separation. Since the Applicant’s condition interfered with his ability to adequately serve in the Marine Corps, the physician emphasized the recommendation for administrative separation of the Applicant.After considering all of the available evidence, to include the...