Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901141
Original file (MD0901141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090121
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19990917 - 19991017     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19991018     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20000822      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 05 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 89
MOS: 9971
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF : NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20000614 :       For your diagnosed personality disorder that hinders your ability to train.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ PERSONALITY DISORDER
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:            Service / Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:     
         Additional Statements :
                   From Applicant:            From Representat ion :               From Congress member :    
         Other Documentation :    


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Applicant seeks upgrade due to circumstances beyond his control.               

Decision

 Date: 20 0 9 1029            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning for his diagnosis of his personality disorder, which resulted in his discharge. When processed for a d ministrative s eparation, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority. The Applicant was not entitled to an a dministrative discharge b oard.

Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was discharged due to ci rcumstances beyond his control. He had injured his ankle in boot camp and had to change his initial military o ccupational s pecialty (MOS) to a different MOS than he had originally signed-up for. The Applicant states he suffered from slight mental anguish from these circumstances, which eventually led to a recommendation that he be expeditiously discharge d from the Marine Corps due to personality disorder. The NDRB noted the Applicant was seen multiple times for physical and mental health issues in his short career in the Marine Corps. On 31 May 2000, the clinical psychologist from the Mental Health department, Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, diagnosed the Applicant with Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood and Borderline Personality Disorder, EPTE (existed prior to entry). In a follow-up visit with a mental health provider on 11 June 2000, the counseling revealed alarming p ersonality tr aits and medical issues . The Applicant revealed he had at least two prior suicide attempts. He also revealed he was a “cutter,” which is someone who gets pleasure from self-mutilation, and also had burned himself. The Applicant also admitted he stutters and has a history of petit mal seizures. On the Applicant’s medical history form, prior to enlistment, he marked “NO” on all blocks dealing with suicide, stuttering, loss of memory, etc. (basically, all elements that were relevant to his eventual discharge). The NDRB determined the Applicant excluded pertinent information , including the omission or concealment of facts which, if known at the time, would have reasonably been expected to preclude, postpone, or otherwise affect the Marine's eligibility for enlistment or induction. By not accurately revealing his pre-service medical history, the Applicant caused the Marine Corps to expend a great deal of time and resources on known ailments. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additi onal Reviews , and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual,
(MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.
ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002050

    Original file (MD1002050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101965

    Original file (MD1101965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001148

    Original file (MD1001148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The diagnosing Psychologist clearly specified that the Applicant did not have a severe mental disorder and was not considered to be mentally disordered; as such, administrative discharge, vice a medical evaluation board with disability, was proper and was warranted. Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, additional supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant, and the discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100135

    Original file (MD1100135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s record of service, medical officer recommendations for administrative separation due to OCD, and future potential for service, the Applicant’s Commanding Officer processed him for administrative separation. Since the Applicant’s condition interfered with his ability to adequately serve in the Marine Corps, the physician emphasized the recommendation for administrative separation of the Applicant.After considering all of the available evidence, to include the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001070

    Original file (MD1001070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB found the Applicant’s engagement in fraud warranted the General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001590

    Original file (MD1001590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant contends he should have received a medical separation vice an administrative separation.3. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902082

    Original file (MD0902082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Lied about his mental health history to hide his homosexuality.2. The NDRB considers post-service conduct to determine if the misconduct committed during active duty was indicative of the Applicant's character or an aberration, but post-service conduct applies to the characterization of the discharge and not the narrative reason for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101041

    Original file (MD1101041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. On 10 May 2005, after considering the Applicant’s service and medical records and endorsements from his chain of command, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be discharged from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Personality Disorder. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500780

    Original file (MD1500780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling stating the Applicant is not recommended for reenlistment by reason of Fraudulent Enlistment for: Adjustment disorder; History of ADHD. During the enlistment process into the Marine Corps, the Applicant was asked to provide any medical history of counseling or treatment for a mental health condition which he denied. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100262

    Original file (ND1100262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Narrative Reason for Separation will not change since a Personality Disorder was diagnosed by a credentialed medical care provider.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand the administrative separation process, the Board found the discharge was proper but not equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...