Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901509
Original file (MD0901509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090512
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19971205 - 19981202     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19981203     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20031027      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 59
MOS: 2111
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): /   Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA : 20010807-20010810 (3 days); 20020524-20020624 (30 days)

NJP:
- 20000620 :       Article 86 (U nauthorized absence: fail ure to go at time prescribed )
         Article 92 (Willfully dis obeyed a written lawful order: 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Allowing LCpl to check his weapon out of the Armory without a valid NAVMC                         10520 in his possession on 0500, 20000612
                  Specification 2: Allowing Cpl to obtain custody of his weapon without having a valid NAVMC                        10520 in his possession on 0500, 20000615
         Awarded : Susp ended:

SCM:

SPCM:
- 20020515 :       Art icle 86 (UA 20020401-20020418 ( 17 days))
         Article 112a (Drug abuse, wrongful use of a controlled substance: 3 specifications )
                  Specification 1: Wrongful use of cocaine
                  Specification 2: Wrongful use of marijuana
                  Specification 3: Wrongful use of methamphetamine
          Sentence : BCD CONF FOR 60 DAYS (20020418-20020514 (27 DAYS) ) RIR TO E-1
         [ CA Action: Sentence is approved and, except for BCD, ordered executed, but execution of that portion of the sentence adjudging all confinement in excess of 45 days is suspended for a period of 12 months. ]

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 19991003 :       For failure to follow orders by refusing to report to the Battery Office for counseling.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE ”
         “ (3) 20010807-20010810; (17) 20020401-20020417; (27) 20020418-20020514; (30) 20020524-20020624; (89) 20020625-20020923 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:            Service / Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:     
         Additional Statements :
                   From Applicant:            From Representat ion :               From Congress member :    
         Other Documentation :      ( Congressional request )


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. The applicant seeks a n upgrade or RE-code change, whichever will allow him to in reenlist into the Armed Forces.      
2. The Applicant claims he was a good Marine and was unfairly discharged.        

Decision

 Date : 2010 0128             Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall DISCHARGE .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT-MARTIAL .
Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) and a Special Court-Martial (SPCM) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Unauthorized absence - 2 specifications: failure to go to prescribed place of duty on time and being UA for 17 days), Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation- 2 specifications: o n two separate occasions, he allowed Marines to check out weapon s without a valid NAVMC 10520 weapon s card in their possession ) and Article 112a (Drug abuse, wrongful u se of a controlled su bstance – 3 specifications: Cocaine, Marijuana and Methamphetamines ). The Applicant had a pre-service dr ug waiver for using marijuana 75-100 times prior to entering the Marine Corps, and acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Us e of Drugs on 24 November 1997 . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command sent him to a SPCM, during which he was found guilty on multiple charges, sentenced and given a punitive discharge.

: (Nondecisional ) The applicant seeks an upgrade or RE-code change, whichever will allow him to in reenlist into the Armed Forces. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded based on his record of service which was good apart from a single period of misconduct , and that he was unfairly discharged . After a review of his service record, the NDRB opined that the Applicant’s service clearly did not meet the standards of conduct expected of a U.S. Marine as he displayed sustained, vice a single period, of misconduct . The NDRB looks at each request and situation on a case-by case basis and found that the Applicant’s concerns that he was unfairly treated also has no merit. His command acted within regulation s to pursue a punitive discharge for his misconduct. The NDRB also noted that the Applicant failed to provide any post-service documentation in support of his request for clemency/upgrade . Clemency denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense s he committed. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Employment/Educational Opportunities and Post-Service Conduct .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800759

    Original file (MD0800759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002045

    Original file (MD1002045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001649

    Original file (MD1001649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant wants his discharge upgraded so he can receive veterans medical benefits.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge....

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101000

    Original file (ND1101000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews :...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700013

    Original file (MD0700013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Specification: Unauthorized absence. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201200

    Original file (MD1201200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the Applicant’s record of service, medical records, combat deployment, misconduct, and separation proceedings, the NDRB determined his PTSD did not mitigate his misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700569

    Original file (MD0700569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000712 - 20000729Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000730Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20020612Length of Service: 01 Yrs 10Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: 22 Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700851

    Original file (MD0700851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post Service DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL Date:20071220Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Discharge Process Charge(s) Preferred: 20010831 Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 86: Unauthorized...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801772

    Original file (MD0801772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the Applicant’s conduct cannot be tolerated in a military environment, based on similar cases reviewed by the NDRB and the awarded discharge characterization those cases received for offenses of greater, and lesser, severity, the NDRB determined clemency was warranted in the Applicant’s case. The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700710

    Original file (MD0700710.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19980811 - 19980909 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19980910 Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20010831Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11 Mths 22 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...